Comparative Analysis of Dropout Prevention Policies in South Korea and Japan

[Purpose] This study analyzes the 2023 dropout prevention policies in South Korea and Japan to inform South Korea's approach. It focuses on increasing dropout rates and the challenges faced by students without external support post-COVID-19. [Method] Using Kohn's (1989) classification, it categorizes policies into three areas: academic strategies, psychological support, and environmental improvements. [Results] South Korea prioritizes early identification and tailored support for at-risk students, including alternative education and vocational training for out-of-school youth, supported by a data-driven management system. In contrast, Japan focuses on personalized support, digital learning environments, and early warning systems, offering diverse schooling options to meet students' needs. [Conclusion] Both countries prioritize dropout prevention but use different strategies. South Korea focuses on early identification and psychological support, while Japan employs digital tools and early warning systems. Integrating Japan's system could enhance South Korea's initiatives.