A Comparative Study on School Bullying Policy in South Korea and the United States

[Purpose] This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of school bullying policies in South Korea and the United States. It focuses on differences in legal frameworks, policy development, and implementation processes, particularly emphasizing the centralized approach in Korea versus the decentralized approach in the U.S. [Methods] A qualitative content analysis was performed on anti-bullying legislation, policies, and training programs in both countries. Key elements such as definitions, preventive measures, and educator training were examined to identify patterns and discrepancies. [Results] The analysis revealed that Korea employs a standardized, government-led approach emphasizing uniformity and consistency, while the U.S. adopts a locally adaptable framework tailored to state-specific needs. Both nations prioritize early intervention and stakeholder collaboration, but their training systems for educators diverge in terms of inclusivity and execution. [Conclusion] The study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each country's policies, offering recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of anti-bullying measures. The findings underline the importance of balancing centralization with local flexibility, fostering comprehensive educator training, and incorporating mental health support to create safer school environments globally.