Rapid Assessment of Concrete Resistance to Physical Sulfate Attack: Effects of the Binder, the Water-to-Binder Ratio, and the Entrained Air

Concrete surfaces in the evaporation zone above sulfate-rich soils are subject to severe damage from scaling. Such a physical sulfate attack (PSA) on concrete is a consequence of a cyclic regime between hot-dry and cold-wet environments, during which sodium sulfate crystals expand within the porous media (binder matrix or aggregate) and exert high pressure on the pore walls. Currently, no accepted standard exists for evaluating the resistance of concrete to the PSA phenomenon. In this study, an accelerated physical sulfate attack test protocol was used to determine the effect of blended cement and water-to-binder ratio on concrete resistance to PSA. The testing included a preconditioning protocol for presaturating concrete specimens in a 10% sodium sulfate solution for 15 days, with heat-drying specimens at 50°C before and after immersion. Specimens were then partially immersed in a 10% sodium sulfate solution and subjected to a cyclic regime composed of hot-dry [40°C, 30% RH] and cold-wet [8°C, 85% RH] conditions for 19 h each, separated by a 4-h transition at room temperature. Silica fume (GUb-SF), limestone (GUL), and slag (GUb-S) blended cements were used and compared with general use (GU) cement. A fifth binder (GUL-GP) contained 20% glass powder as a partial replacement of the limestone—portland cement was also used. Three different water-to-binder ratios were used for each binder: 0.35, 0.45, and 0.55. As expected, mixes with lower water-to-binder ratios showed the best performance against PSA, i.e., the lowest mass loss after 15 cycles of exposure (30 days). GUb-SF cement improved the resistance of mixtures with a high water-to-binder ratio compared to GU mixtures. Contrary to silica fume and slag, limestone reduced the resistance of concrete to PSA and showed the highest rate of visual damage for all water-to-binder ratios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-17418
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid Assessment of Concrete Resistance to Physical Sulfate Attack: Effects of the Binder, the Water-to-Binder Ratio, and the Entrained Air

William Wilson, Arezki Tagnit‐Hamou, Redha Esselami
1 citations
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Building materials and conservation
0.52
article

Rapid Assessment of Concrete Resistance to Physical Sulfate Attack: Effects of the Binder, the Water-to-Binder Ratio, and the Entrained Air

William Wilson, Arezki Tagnit‐Hamou, Redha Esselami
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Concrete surfaces in the evaporation zone above sulfate-rich soils are subject to severe damage from scaling. Such a physical sulfate attack (PSA) on concrete is a consequence of a cyclic regime between hot-dry and cold-wet environments, during which sodium sulfate crystals expand within the porous media (binder matrix or aggregate) and exert high pressure on the pore walls. Currently, no accepted standard exists for evaluating the resistance of concrete to the PSA phenomenon. In this study, an accelerated physical sulfate attack test protocol was used to determine the effect of blended cement and water-to-binder ratio on concrete resistance to PSA. The testing included a preconditioning protocol for presaturating concrete specimens in a 10% sodium sulfate solution for 15 days, with heat-drying specimens at 50°C before and after immersion. Specimens were then partially immersed in a 10% sodium sulfate solution and subjected to a cyclic regime composed of hot-dry [40°C, 30% RH] and cold-wet [8°C, 85% RH] conditions for 19 h each, separated by a 4-h transition at room temperature. Silica fume (GUb-SF), limestone (GUL), and slag (GUb-S) blended cements were used and compared with general use (GU) cement. A fifth binder (GUL-GP) contained 20% glass powder as a partial replacement of the limestone—portland cement was also used. Three different water-to-binder ratios were used for each binder: 0.35, 0.45, and 0.55. As expected, mixes with lower water-to-binder ratios showed the best performance against PSA, i.e., the lowest mass loss after 15 cycles of exposure (30 days). GUb-SF cement improved the resistance of mixtures with a high water-to-binder ratio compared to GU mixtures. Contrary to silica fume and slag, limestone reduced the resistance of concrete to PSA and showed the highest rate of visual damage for all water-to-binder ratios.

Journal of Materials in Civil EngineeringVol. 37(2)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Building materials and conservation
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.