Telehealth for Maternity Care: Qualitative Perspectives of Clinicians and Mothers

<h3>Background</h3> The use of telehealth to mitigate the maternity care crisis is an area of great interest. Telehealth as an alternative to in-person health appointments gained prominence at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health institutions rapidly adopted video and voice consultations to limit viral transmissions. Importantly, the post-pandemic period has yet to slow the use of telehealth, with an increasing number of physicians integrating telehealth into their workflow. Research has associated telehealth interventions with reduced self-reported smoking during pregnancy, reduced risk of gestational hypertension, and continuation of breastfeeding. However, health leaders have cautioned about expanding telehealth into maternal-fetal medicine. This concern is in part due to the risk of replacing in-person visits, which are beneficial for building rapport in the mother-infant-provider relationship. Furthermore, mothers’ and maternity care providers’ attitudes towards telehealth have not been fully explored, including their perspectives on the extent to which telehealth may be accepted for use. <h3>Methods</h3> Twenty-eight interviews were conducted with clinicians and mothers to understand their experiences with maternal care in Utah, including telehealth use. Purposive sampling was used for recruitment and interview transcripts were analyzed using iterative thematic synthesis. <h3>Results</h3> Participants reported that telehealth was acceptable for basic pregnancy check-ins, such as to monitor symptoms, discuss health concerns, and for information on medication safety. Clinicians practicing in rural areas mentioned using telehealth for mental health care and finding it beneficial for specialist consultations on pregnancy complications. Participants also described challenges to expanding telehealth. For example, telehealth was not viewed as user friendly for clinical use. Also, telehealth can be a barrier to health equity, as it is sometimes limited to affluent populations. Further, lower insurance reimbursement rates can limit its clinical use. Ideal future of telehealth includes extensive infrastructure support, training on telehealth use, and research on telehealth for fetal heart health screenings. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Telehealth is beneficial for rapid communication between providers and mothers. There are reservations about replacing large aspects of pregnancy care with virtual visits. More research is needed on best practices for integrating telehealth with maternity care.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6219
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Telehealth for Maternity Care: Qualitative Perspectives of Clinicians and Mothers

Dominik Ose, Robert E. Owens, Katherine T. Fortenberry, Emmanuel Adediran et al.
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Telehealth for Maternity Care: Qualitative Perspectives of Clinicians and Mothers

Dominik Ose, Robert E. Owens, Katherine T. Fortenberry, Emmanuel Adediran, Thomas J. Whittaker
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> The use of telehealth to mitigate the maternity care crisis is an area of great interest. Telehealth as an alternative to in-person health appointments gained prominence at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health institutions rapidly adopted video and voice consultations to limit viral transmissions. Importantly, the post-pandemic period has yet to slow the use of telehealth, with an increasing number of physicians integrating telehealth into their workflow. Research has associated telehealth interventions with reduced self-reported smoking during pregnancy, reduced risk of gestational hypertension, and continuation of breastfeeding. However, health leaders have cautioned about expanding telehealth into maternal-fetal medicine. This concern is in part due to the risk of replacing in-person visits, which are beneficial for building rapport in the mother-infant-provider relationship. Furthermore, mothers’ and maternity care providers’ attitudes towards telehealth have not been fully explored, including their perspectives on the extent to which telehealth may be accepted for use. <h3>Methods</h3> Twenty-eight interviews were conducted with clinicians and mothers to understand their experiences with maternal care in Utah, including telehealth use. Purposive sampling was used for recruitment and interview transcripts were analyzed using iterative thematic synthesis. <h3>Results</h3> Participants reported that telehealth was acceptable for basic pregnancy check-ins, such as to monitor symptoms, discuss health concerns, and for information on medication safety. Clinicians practicing in rural areas mentioned using telehealth for mental health care and finding it beneficial for specialist consultations on pregnancy complications. Participants also described challenges to expanding telehealth. For example, telehealth was not viewed as user friendly for clinical use. Also, telehealth can be a barrier to health equity, as it is sometimes limited to affluent populations. Further, lower insurance reimbursement rates can limit its clinical use. Ideal future of telehealth includes extensive infrastructure support, training on telehealth use, and research on telehealth for fetal heart health screenings. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Telehealth is beneficial for rapid communication between providers and mothers. There are reservations about replacing large aspects of pregnancy care with virtual visits. More research is needed on best practices for integrating telehealth with maternity care.

Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.