CGM in Primary Care: Characteristics and Choice of CGM Implementation Strategy in PREPARE 4 CGM

<h3>Context</h3> Most diabetes care occurs in primary care (PC). CGM is associated with clinical and psychosocial benefits. While CGM uptake in PC is rising, understanding models to support CGM use in diverse PC practices is needed. The PREPARE 4 CGM study evaluates different strategies to implement CGM into PC practices. <h3>Objective</h3> To compare practice characteristics collected at baseline between those choosing a practice-led, self-paced CGM implementation plan or a referral to a virtual implementation service. <h3>Study Design and Analysis</h3> This study is a cluster randomized trial within a larger quasi-experimental study. Baseline characteristics were examined via cross-sectional descriptive and inferential analyses. <h3>Setting or Dataset</h3> 76 Colorado primary care practices. <h3>Population Studied</h3> Primary care practice characteristics. <h3>Intervention/Instrument</h3> Implementation strategies consisted of opting in to a practice-led, self-paced CGM implementation plan or referral to a virtual CGM initiation service created as part of the study and staffed by primary care team members. <h3>Outcome Measures</h3> Approximately 50 practice characteristics such as staffing, size, specialty, payer mix. <h3>Results</h3> Of 76 enrolled practices, 46 chose self-paced implementation, 16 of which (35%) had a DCES in the practice; of the 30 that chose the virtual service, none (0%) had a DCES, p &lt;.001. Aside from having a DCES, no differences were seen between groups. <h3>Conclusions</h3> While other practice characteristics were not associated with implementation strategy choice, having a DCES was highly associated: all practices with a DCES chose self-paced implementation. DCES may serve as technology champions in PC practices. Referral to the virtual service allowed access to a DCES and multidisciplinary team for practices without them. As many practices without a DCES also chose self-paced implementation, multiple models may be necessary to increase CGM implementation in primary care.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6104
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CGM in Primary Care: Characteristics and Choice of CGM Implementation Strategy in PREPARE 4 CGM

W. Perry Dickinson, TAMARA OSER, Tristen Hall, Kristin Crispe et al.
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
article

CGM in Primary Care: Characteristics and Choice of CGM Implementation Strategy in PREPARE 4 CGM

W. Perry Dickinson, TAMARA OSER, Tristen Hall, Kristin Crispe, Kimberly Wiggins, Danika Buss
article en

Abstract

<h3>Context</h3> Most diabetes care occurs in primary care (PC). CGM is associated with clinical and psychosocial benefits. While CGM uptake in PC is rising, understanding models to support CGM use in diverse PC practices is needed. The PREPARE 4 CGM study evaluates different strategies to implement CGM into PC practices. <h3>Objective</h3> To compare practice characteristics collected at baseline between those choosing a practice-led, self-paced CGM implementation plan or a referral to a virtual implementation service. <h3>Study Design and Analysis</h3> This study is a cluster randomized trial within a larger quasi-experimental study. Baseline characteristics were examined via cross-sectional descriptive and inferential analyses. <h3>Setting or Dataset</h3> 76 Colorado primary care practices. <h3>Population Studied</h3> Primary care practice characteristics. <h3>Intervention/Instrument</h3> Implementation strategies consisted of opting in to a practice-led, self-paced CGM implementation plan or referral to a virtual CGM initiation service created as part of the study and staffed by primary care team members. <h3>Outcome Measures</h3> Approximately 50 practice characteristics such as staffing, size, specialty, payer mix. <h3>Results</h3> Of 76 enrolled practices, 46 chose self-paced implementation, 16 of which (35%) had a DCES in the practice; of the 30 that chose the virtual service, none (0%) had a DCES, p &lt;.001. Aside from having a DCES, no differences were seen between groups. <h3>Conclusions</h3> While other practice characteristics were not associated with implementation strategy choice, having a DCES was highly associated: all practices with a DCES chose self-paced implementation. DCES may serve as technology champions in PC practices. Referral to the virtual service allowed access to a DCES and multidisciplinary team for practices without them. As many practices without a DCES also chose self-paced implementation, multiple models may be necessary to increase CGM implementation in primary care.

Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.