[Efficacy and safety assessment of transnasal nebulisation of budesonide in children with adenoid hypertrophy].

<b>Objective:</b>To investigate the efficacy and assess the safety of transnasal nebulisation of budesonide in children with adenoid hypertrophy. <b>Methods:</b>Children with adenoid hypertrophy who attended the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between December 2021 and December 2022 were randomly assigned to budesonide high-dose group(Group A: budesonide 1 mg/dose + saline nasal rinse), budesonide low-dose group(Group B: budesonide 0.5 mg/dose + saline nasal rinse), and control group(Group C: saline nasal rinse), and each group 20 children were collected separately, The efficacy and safety of transnasal nebulisation of budesonide in children with adenoid hypertrophy were assessed by comparing the symptomatic VAS scores, adenoidal nasopharyngeal lateral radiographs A/N values, nocturnal sleep oximetry(SaO2), and the incidence of adverse events during the treatment period of 8-week in the three groups. <b>Results:</b>The 8-week baseline differences in adenoid A/N values were statistically different between groups A and B(<i>P</i><0.001) and A and C(<i>P</i>=0.022), with the reduced amount in adenoid volume being most pronounced in group A, which differed from the other two groups. With the increase of intervention time, SaO2 levels gradually increased(<i>F</i>=154.725, <i>P</i><0.001) and VAS scores gradually decreased(<i>F</i>=165.616, <i>P</i><0.001) in all three groups. After 8 weeks of treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in SaO2 level(<i>P</i>=0.085) between groups A and B. There was a statistically significant difference in VAS total scores between Group A and Group B (<i>P</i> < 0.05) . The improvement of SaO2and total VAS score in group A was higher than that in group B. There was a statistically significant difference in the comparison of SaO2 level and total VAS score between groups A and B, and between groups A and C(<i>P</i><0.01); after the intervention of the three groups, showing the greatest improvement of total VAS score and SaO2in the group A, followed by Group B. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events among Groups A, B, and C throughout the trial. <b>Conclusion:</b>The treatment of children with adenoid hypertrophy by intranasal nebulisation of budesonide suspension has good efficacy and safety, which is conducive to reducing the size of adenoids, improving the clinical symptoms of children with adenoid hypertrophy, and improving the SaO2of nocturnal sleep, and it has a certain clinical application value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.12.012
Primary Topic
Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Efficacy and safety assessment of transnasal nebulisation of budesonide in children with adenoid hypertrophy].

Yong Fu, Jiahua Shen, Zhiying Zhou, Zhiyi Wang et al.
PubMed
Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
article

[Efficacy and safety assessment of transnasal nebulisation of budesonide in children with adenoid hypertrophy].

Yong Fu, Jiahua Shen, Zhiying Zhou, Zhiyi Wang, Wenxin Chen
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b>To investigate the efficacy and assess the safety of transnasal nebulisation of budesonide in children with adenoid hypertrophy. <b>Methods:</b>Children with adenoid hypertrophy who attended the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between December 2021 and December 2022 were randomly assigned to budesonide high-dose group(Group A: budesonide 1 mg/dose + saline nasal rinse), budesonide low-dose group(Group B: budesonide 0.5 mg/dose + saline nasal rinse), and control group(Group C: saline nasal rinse), and each group 20 children were collected separately, The efficacy and safety of transnasal nebulisation of budesonide in children with adenoid hypertrophy were assessed by comparing the symptomatic VAS scores, adenoidal nasopharyngeal lateral radiographs A/N values, nocturnal sleep oximetry(SaO2), and the incidence of adverse events during the treatment period of 8-week in the three groups. <b>Results:</b>The 8-week baseline differences in adenoid A/N values were statistically different between groups A and B(<i>P</i><0.001) and A and C(<i>P</i>=0.022), with the reduced amount in adenoid volume being most pronounced in group A, which differed from the other two groups. With the increase of intervention time, SaO2 levels gradually increased(<i>F</i>=154.725, <i>P</i><0.001) and VAS scores gradually decreased(<i>F</i>=165.616, <i>P</i><0.001) in all three groups. After 8 weeks of treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in SaO2 level(<i>P</i>=0.085) between groups A and B. There was a statistically significant difference in VAS total scores between Group A and Group B (<i>P</i> < 0.05) . The improvement of SaO2and total VAS score in group A was higher than that in group B. There was a statistically significant difference in the comparison of SaO2 level and total VAS score between groups A and B, and between groups A and C(<i>P</i><0.01); after the intervention of the three groups, showing the greatest improvement of total VAS score and SaO2in the group A, followed by Group B. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events among Groups A, B, and C throughout the trial. <b>Conclusion:</b>The treatment of children with adenoid hypertrophy by intranasal nebulisation of budesonide suspension has good efficacy and safety, which is conducive to reducing the size of adenoids, improving the clinical symptoms of children with adenoid hypertrophy, and improving the SaO2of nocturnal sleep, and it has a certain clinical application value.

PubMedVol. 38(12)
Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.