Kinetic Analysis of Cyclization by the Substrate-Tolerant Lanthipeptide Synthetase ProcM

Lanthipeptides are ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) characterized by the presence of thioether cross-links called lanthionine and methyllanthionine, formed by dehydration of Ser/Thr residues and Michael-type addition of Cys side chains onto the resulting dehydroamino acids. Class II lanthipeptide synthetases are bifunctional enzymes responsible for both steps, thus generating macrocyclic natural products. ProcM is part of a group of class II lanthipeptide synthetases that are known for their remarkable substrate tolerance, having large numbers of natural substrates with highly diverse peptide sequences. They install multiple (methyl)lanthionine rings with high accuracy, attributes that have been used to make large libraries of polycyclic peptides. Previous studies suggested that the final ring pattern of the lanthipeptide product may be determined by the substrate sequence rather than by ProcM. The current investigation on the ProcM-catalyzed modification of one of its 30 natural substrates (ProcA3.3) and its sequence variants utilizes kinetic assays to understand the factors that determine the ring pattern. The data show that changes in the substrate sequence result in changes to the reaction rates of ring formation that in some cases lead to a change in the order of the modifications and thereby bring about different ring patterns. These observations provide further support that the substrate sequence determines to a large degree the final ring pattern. The data also show that similar to a previous study on another substrate (ProcA2.8), the reaction rates of successive reactions slow down as the peptide is matured; rate constants observed for the reactions of these two substrates are similar, suggesting that they reflect the intrinsic activity of the enzyme with its 30 natural substrates. We also investigated whether rates of formation of single isolated rings can predict the final ring pattern of polycyclic products, an important question for the products of genome mining exercises, as well as library generation. Collectively, the findings in this study indicate that the rates of isolated modifications can be used for predicting the final ProcM-produced ring pattern, but they also revealed limitations. One unexpected observation was that even changing Ser to Thr and vice versa, a common means to convert lanthionine to methyllanthionine and vice versa, can result in a change in the ring pattern.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Catalysis
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c06216
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinetic Analysis of Cyclization by the Substrate-Tolerant Lanthipeptide Synthetase ProcM

Emily K. Desormeaux, Wilfred A. van der Donk, Garrett J. Barksdale
3 citations
ACS Catalysis
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
1.34
article

Kinetic Analysis of Cyclization by the Substrate-Tolerant Lanthipeptide Synthetase ProcM

Emily K. Desormeaux, Wilfred A. van der Donk, Garrett J. Barksdale
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Lanthipeptides are ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) characterized by the presence of thioether cross-links called lanthionine and methyllanthionine, formed by dehydration of Ser/Thr residues and Michael-type addition of Cys side chains onto the resulting dehydroamino acids. Class II lanthipeptide synthetases are bifunctional enzymes responsible for both steps, thus generating macrocyclic natural products. ProcM is part of a group of class II lanthipeptide synthetases that are known for their remarkable substrate tolerance, having large numbers of natural substrates with highly diverse peptide sequences. They install multiple (methyl)lanthionine rings with high accuracy, attributes that have been used to make large libraries of polycyclic peptides. Previous studies suggested that the final ring pattern of the lanthipeptide product may be determined by the substrate sequence rather than by ProcM. The current investigation on the ProcM-catalyzed modification of one of its 30 natural substrates (ProcA3.3) and its sequence variants utilizes kinetic assays to understand the factors that determine the ring pattern. The data show that changes in the substrate sequence result in changes to the reaction rates of ring formation that in some cases lead to a change in the order of the modifications and thereby bring about different ring patterns. These observations provide further support that the substrate sequence determines to a large degree the final ring pattern. The data also show that similar to a previous study on another substrate (ProcA2.8), the reaction rates of successive reactions slow down as the peptide is matured; rate constants observed for the reactions of these two substrates are similar, suggesting that they reflect the intrinsic activity of the enzyme with its 30 natural substrates. We also investigated whether rates of formation of single isolated rings can predict the final ring pattern of polycyclic products, an important question for the products of genome mining exercises, as well as library generation. Collectively, the findings in this study indicate that the rates of isolated modifications can be used for predicting the final ProcM-produced ring pattern, but they also revealed limitations. One unexpected observation was that even changing Ser to Thr and vice versa, a common means to convert lanthionine to methyllanthionine and vice versa, can result in a change in the ring pattern.

ACS CatalysisVol. 14(24)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
1.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.