AI ethics by design: implementing customizable guardrails for responsible AI development

This paper explores the development of an ethical guardrail framework for AI systems, emphasizing the importance of customizable guardrails that align with diverse user values and underlying ethics. We address the challenges of AI ethics by proposing a structure that integrates rules, policies, and AI assistants to ensure responsible AI behavior, while comparing the proposed framework to the existing state-of-the-art guardrails. By focusing on practical mechanisms for implementing ethical standards, we aim to enhance transparency, user autonomy, and continuous improvement in AI systems. Our approach accommodates ethical pluralism, offering a flexible and adaptable solution for the evolving landscape of AI governance. The paper concludes with strategies for resolving conflicts between ethical directives, underscoring the present and future need for robust, nuanced and context-aware AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01492-7
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

AI ethics by design: implementing customizable guardrails for responsible AI development

Jonathan Rodriguez Cefalù, Kristina Šekrst, Jeremy McHugh
17 citations
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
14.02
article

AI ethics by design: implementing customizable guardrails for responsible AI development

Jonathan Rodriguez Cefalù, Kristina Šekrst, Jeremy McHugh
article en
17 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the development of an ethical guardrail framework for AI systems, emphasizing the importance of customizable guardrails that align with diverse user values and underlying ethics. We address the challenges of AI ethics by proposing a structure that integrates rules, policies, and AI assistants to ensure responsible AI behavior, while comparing the proposed framework to the existing state-of-the-art guardrails. By focusing on practical mechanisms for implementing ethical standards, we aim to enhance transparency, user autonomy, and continuous improvement in AI systems. Our approach accommodates ethical pluralism, offering a flexible and adaptable solution for the evolving landscape of AI governance. The paper concludes with strategies for resolving conflicts between ethical directives, underscoring the present and future need for robust, nuanced and context-aware AI systems.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(6)
University of Zagreb (HR)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
14.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon