Inequalities in geographic barriers and patient representation in lymphoma clinical trials across England

The distribution of trial site locations may lead to disparities in geographic access and affect patient representativeness in clinical trials. We utilised trial data covering 1993-2022 from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Open Data Platform, 2011 and 2021 English Census and geographic data and English individual-patient cancer registry data for patients diagnosed with lymphoma between 1997 and 2017. To assess representation, we compared patient age and sex between trial participants and the incident population. We mapped the distance and travel times of English lower layer super output areas (LSOAs) to their nearest research active NHS Trusts and assessed associations between distance and travel times and the geographic and sociodemographic characteristics of the LSOAs. Trial participants were younger than the incident population and more likely to be male. The closest NHS Trust to more than half of English LSOAs was not research active. Greater LSOA mean age, male percent, White British percent, rurality and coastal/border status were positively associated with distance and travel time (at prespecified p < 0.05 level), while greater deprivation was negatively associated. Female and older lymphoma patients in England are underrepresented in trials, with the latter facing a higher burden of geographic barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Haematology
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19907
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequalities in geographic barriers and patient representation in lymphoma clinical trials across England

Jake Probert, Jane Wolstenholme, Rebecca Shakir, Laurence S. J. Roope et al.
3 citations
British Journal of Haematology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.85
article

Inequalities in geographic barriers and patient representation in lymphoma clinical trials across England

Jake Probert, Jane Wolstenholme, Rebecca Shakir, Laurence S. J. Roope, Johanna Ramroth, David J. Cutter, John Broggio, Philip Clarke, Katie Spencer, David A. Jones, Graham P. Collins, Frank Burroughs
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The distribution of trial site locations may lead to disparities in geographic access and affect patient representativeness in clinical trials. We utilised trial data covering 1993-2022 from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Open Data Platform, 2011 and 2021 English Census and geographic data and English individual-patient cancer registry data for patients diagnosed with lymphoma between 1997 and 2017. To assess representation, we compared patient age and sex between trial participants and the incident population. We mapped the distance and travel times of English lower layer super output areas (LSOAs) to their nearest research active NHS Trusts and assessed associations between distance and travel times and the geographic and sociodemographic characteristics of the LSOAs. Trial participants were younger than the incident population and more likely to be male. The closest NHS Trust to more than half of English LSOAs was not research active. Greater LSOA mean age, male percent, White British percent, rurality and coastal/border status were positively associated with distance and travel time (at prespecified p < 0.05 level), while greater deprivation was negatively associated. Female and older lymphoma patients in England are underrepresented in trials, with the latter facing a higher burden of geographic barriers.

British Journal of HaematologyVol. 206(2)
University of Leeds (GB), At Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), National Cancer Registration Service (GB), NHS England
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.