Review of periodical literature for 2023: (iii) 1500–1700

The year 2023 saw many publications in the fields of early modern economic and social history. The articles discussed in this round-up cover topics which have been a mainstay over recent years, including histories of labour (especially women's work), colonialism, and slavery. Agrarian history has lately gained renewed attention, and once again featured in this year's scholarship. A notable cluster of articles focused on what petitions – of which large collections survive – can tell us about the early modern economy, society, and the state. The gender split of authors was roughly equal this year, a testament to the rich and diverse topics that this year's articles cover. Labour history was the focus of several articles. The hiring of over 1000 unskilled workers for the rebuilding of St Paul's Cathedral in London between 1672 and 1748 is the subject of an article by Paker, Stephenson, and Wallis. Applying econometric analysis to records of labourers hired, the authors find that hiring practices ‘encouraged retention and reduced turnover, giving a core group of laborers more work, priority in rehiring after slowdowns, and access to additional ways to earn.’ (p. 1101). Over time, the share of ‘new’ workers (i.e. those who had not previously worked on St Paul's) fell (p. 1110). Casual, transient work was not the pattern of hiring here at St Paul's; rather, the length of time a worker had been employed was rewarded with additional labour opportunities. A synthesis of recent publications on work and identity is offered in an article by Hailwood and Waddell. In particular, the article draws attention to recent scholarship on the breadth of working identities that moves beyond categorizing people into ‘sorts’. The authors call for future scholarship which comparatively analyses types of sources (e.g. self-created versus indirect evidence) as well as how working identities might intersect with ‘time, place, gender, forms of labour, and race’ (p. 158). An article by McVitty contributes to this growing scholarship on work and identity. She exposes a pre-modern culture of sexual misconduct and gendered violence in the legal profession through close study of a range of legal records (court records, internal records of Inns of Court, and public proclamations) in fifteenth- and sixteenth-century England. While junior practitioners regularly participated in these behaviours, she argues, senior practitioners were responsible for condoning it (as well as sometimes participating) and shifting the blame to women. Although the legal community punished offenders, prosecution primarily sought to shield reputation and evade public consequences. Sexual misconduct and gendered violence contributed to the forging of tightly bound homosocial bonds that endure and persist within the legal profession today. To understand modern scandals of sexual misconduct within the common law profession, McVitty maintains, we must critically analyse inherited traditions. Articles on women's work have become a strength of early modern economic and social history in recent years. This year, three articles on care work were published. In the first, Shepard traces care work activities of ‘working mothers’ in London from 1675–1800. Identifying incidences of ‘nurse’ (and its variants) in the Proceedings of the Old Bailey Online, Shepard finds that care work was dispersed broadly across a range of women (and sometimes men) in a variety of arrangements. Both a ‘form of pragmatic provision’ and a ‘commercial endeavour’ (p. 18), it was by no means exclusively carried out by the birth mother. In a second article, Mansell also uses court records as a window onto care work. Taking a microhistorical approach, she traces the end-of-life care received by a seventeenth-century unmarried man in Herefordshire. Through the articulations of care work and its value made by the litigant parties and the witnesses who testified on their behalf, she argues that the labour of care – both remunerated and unpaid, and physical and emotional – was economically valued in early modern England. A third article by Fox and Brazier focuses on the profession of midwifery, placing the seventeenth-century oath that midwives were required to swear under the microscope. The authors show that the oaths – a legal instrument of regulation – reveal what was important to both birthing women and to parish authorities. As officeholders themselves, midwives were ‘active participants in state formation’ (p. 248), and the authors note their crucial role in establishing what we might today see as an ethical code of midwifery. A special issue on Scottish women's and gender history in The Scottish Historical Review this year contained three articles of interest to social and economic of the early modern period. The first, authored by Mason, focuses on women's property ownership. According to Scots law, a man could not sell property his wife brought to the marriage nor that jointly acquired during marriage without her consent. This consent was recorded by her signature on the deed and a private examination. Using a sample of approximately 1600 private examinations of seventeenth-century women in Glasgow, Inverness, and St Andrews, Mason questions how far the requirement of married women to consent to these sales constrained their husbands’ power over property. While we cannot know how many women were coerced into the private examination, Mason nonetheless argues that the procedure itself represents the legal importance placed on married women's consent in property transactions and the protection the courts offered them. Women did not hand over their consent freely, she finds. Many exchanged it for other property. Seventeenth-century married women, therefore, were not excluded from legal and economic processes. Sixteenth-century married women were the subject of an article in the same issue by Beattie (with Spence). The article explores the voluminous testamentary archive for sixteenth-century Scotland, finding that around one-third of wills were made by women. Through careful recategorization of those listed in the National Records for Scotland catalogue as ‘sometimes spouses’ from widows to married women, the authors show that wives made up the largest proportion of female testators. A sample of married women's wills shows that they rarely mentioned a husband's consent, were regularly able to bequeath their half or third portion of household goods, and that the clothing and jewellery they left could be extremely valuable. Significantly, the authors find that the women used language of community of property between husband and wife. A third article by Spence examines 2000 wills produced between 1560 and 1600. She argues that women who made wills were well aware of what was theirs to bequeath and that these documents should be read not just as formulaic or prescribed. Rather, they offer something of women's ‘voices’. Spence argues for three distinct ways in which these voices can be heard: firstly, in women naming their executors; second, in their instructions of how to care for children and stepchildren; and thirdly, through the items they left to others in the latter will and legacy sections of their testaments. Using wills from this perspective, she argues, shifts the focus away from other studies that show how women used their voices for ill to those who used their authoritative voices to advance the family position. An article by Brock sheds new light on women's relationship to early modern trade and empire in Asia. The article focuses on the mercantile activities of one woman – Martha Parker – who operated as a merchant with the East India Company (EIC) in the second half of the seventeenth century. She was not alone. Over 1300 women had commercial interactions with EIC between 1600 and 1757, Brock shows. Women's commercial networks and practices within the EIC were key in shaping the Company's structure. Particularly upon their husband's deaths, women were agents in expanding their personal and household economies, accessing networks and using their existing knowledge of trading companies and mercantile business. This was one of several articles this year that expanded our understanding of trade, mercantilism, and the global economy. An article by Bromley shifts our focus from ideas of the ‘centre city’ to the ‘centre country’ in thinking about transnational mercantile networks and global knowledge. Through a close study of trading company debates in the 1690s, the article positions mercantilism as ‘a process of interaction between private interests that stretched beyond London across England and the wider world’ (p. 748). Global knowledge, Bromley finds, was not limited to England's port cities, or domestic/overseas sites held by colonial administrators or Companies. Contribution to public interest, he argues, was asserted ‘by drawing links between private interests and national employment’ (p. 771) and a trade's capacity to support domestic employment. He draws attention to the importance of the middling sorts’ economic beliefs, expressed through the documents they left behind and particularly petitions (a source which we will see attracted great attention this year). The 1604 Treaty of London and the ending of the Anglo-Spanish War was the subject of an article by Gajda. In this article, Gajda sheds light on the importance of merchants’ economic concerns scaffolded in the treaty. She points to the multi-layered and often competing interests of different mercantile groups. Some sought to recover finances lost through war, while others had directly benefited from war. Gadja closely analyses the manuscript tracts produced in making way for peace and is attentive to the lobbies made on both sides to the commissioners for peace negotiations by both individuals and companies. She argues that their attempts to influence the terms of the treaty ‘heralded a new and highly significant indicator of the wider public and central role that commercial concerns now held and would continue to play in the mainstream political life of the nation’ (p. 466). Merchants were also the subject of a piece by Papini. Her study of the accounts of Italian portraitist Antonio Franchi concentrates on the high volume of business he received in the late seventeenth century from British merchants and captains living and working in the port city of Livorno and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. She finds that, despite being notoriously expensive in Livorno, Franchi charged more favourable rates for his portraits than English painters. Meanwhile, the swelling British maritime community in Livorno and Tuscany encouraged artists to move to and work there. The navigation and operation of trade was also the subject of several articles. Jopling questions the usefulness of the term ‘Jamaica discipline’ to describe a set of ideas followed by Anglo-American privateering and pirate groups in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Jopling contests the received narrative that these groups were egalitarian and anti-authoritarian, highlighting instead fragmentation and core differences amongst privateers and pirates. He points to evidence of their intentions to embed themselves within colonial society to legitimize their activities. The social norms these groups adhered to were flexible and inconsistent, rather than constituting any kind of Jamaica discipline. In an article for a forum titled ‘Risk and Uncertainty in the Early Modern World’ published in the same journal, Reid focuses on ideas of risk and profit in British Atlantic merchant shipping. Evolutionary – rather than revolutionary – shifts in shipping technology characterize the British Atlantic maritime economy, he argues. The size of ships, for example, remained consistent throughout the period 1600–1800 due to risk associated with large ships travelling at speed. Instead, fleets grew to ensure the maritime economy remained buoyant. Reid argues for technological conservatism in explaining productivity of British merchant shipping. An article by Ruderman and van Waijenburg explores the revocation of the Royal African Company's (RAC) monopoly in 1698, and particularly the Company's response to its loss in trading privileges. The authors code and analyse the highly systematized format (including stock phrases and repeated commands) of an almost complete set of by the to its captains on to between and into the Company's many of which beyond the of the on the revocation of the the authors find that the Company operated with high both and to and new for more of the trade in African The of the trade itself – captains who the African – could be to the activities of the agents at African and evidence of the Company in the of the of the The the authors to their they to The navigation of also featured in an article by which explores the of legal by English in between legal on the one practices of and (including in which to the or rather than a on the and other legal argues that, through legal as and also their in the English of the on for almost a the shifts made in their of in with English law and terms on which the state with out new and new within the and of (p. This year was a year for articles on global and colonial The labour that the trade upon was the of an article by The that the that labour in English colonial from to The and of and was a of English from as early as the and the of the of in This was not a in a colonial labour he argues. Rather, it was a of access to African An article by draws out important in how the was in to that – to and – the while the who African or for labour and who at their and hiring themselves out as they could be as being than a This argues, into the of an working in England. An article by British of through a study of (including and between and argues that these ideas about in with a that from children to and (p. interest to social and economic is that, for of these and and future (p. while offer for economically has left these and for economic was also the subject of an article by The article focuses on the of a on St a Atlantic the of traces the in of an economic on and labour In St they and argues, of wider He of beyond the of in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. An article by the between and The English for she argues, was a key in English as a for the should be equal importance to the of in the importance of in the society (with for and for and as a from court and records, and narrative sources in from the century into the of English by Early modern histories and histories of the produced a of articles this An article by focused on in drawing new attention to the importance of and the in of and of shows that, by the the of the city had of of the in and around and its into as the An article by a of property of through the of between and The article argues that the of – the could the of a into its as well as the themselves – property in this period. Although was under rates of nonetheless and its the to and a property. The argues, as a means to its that this was were which had economic upon the as the of its Agrarian was the subject of an article by who uses and to embed ideas of and within and seventeenth-century He argues that a in around how should be at the of the seventeenth century. – which ideas of household or within a community – was by a more of and between and the state was by the century. labourers were from the as of (p. rather than of the household articles by the subject of early modern on The article, published in The Historical a close study of over in over in existing of new and of finds that an within early modern English economic (p. argues that, far from being to economic they of a from a society in which was on ideas of community was by ideas of social and to The second article, in the of these same and at through the of shows that the over the interests of private of who were in had a to the – as she argues, they did not or The of it out as the social and the of the A of articles focused on the of the early modern received renewed attention in an article by not on signature on left on the in by those would have Hailwood draws our attention to of that tell us something more about and practices in a society of In particular, he points to the more of he terms and Over recent years, has been an focus on early modern An article by and sheds new light on and practices through the sixteenth-century accounts of of one of England's and show that in was with mercantile well into The article new evidence of how a to early English power through and a A second article by these authors with and a to understand and its in early modern The article and to an using early modern records from a The authors set out to was in the and how did it (p. The article out the process of the and the The they had an by volume of and an of to modern these as new due to in the the authors that was an important source of in early modern England than other and that – several were being – had the to significant The of offered a for the close study of over in the of by The the of those in and in that in were the of the and from across the and its The draws out to to the of being to merchants from the and household in the was the focus of an article published by She a for from using a that accounts for of household over The for the period that closely with those on She as a indicator of living and Both for this argues, on followed the of that the of the household over time had on the of brought a in household away from and and This the and of living to from of making his for the period. and of living was also the focus of an article by Waddell. He explores the of and what it means in early modern history by placing the economic of the under the economic with of late and the the economic of the and in this us to be in the late seventeenth century as a of and economic In the of economic and social early modern society have the power of early modern has been its in recent years, with scholarship expanding in using it as window onto of An article by explores the of through a sample of produced petitions from and between and She argues that, rather than these petitions as to the that was in the seventeenth they tell a of both identity and support as well as and their while also themselves out as individuals in their and through should be as she argues, and both our understanding of An article by also petitions as a source for early modern to scholarship on of a of petitions from between and recorded living while She focuses on or wives who remained in with their and used as a means to from their The article sheds light on the that these women to how they with and the within society of also featured in an article by and Wallis. petitions by to the for early with the records of the the article explores the of as well as for in company of the petitions shows that from within the city and with to the company more made of the The authors find the court was used in of and between and and that court were not to the could in the might female who were working for the wife as of the Company did not in the The authors a in the records and of with by companies around in (and more for female The in petitions is in article on the monopoly of in early seventeenth century England. explores the operation and of through a made by the Company in with the support of the of London the who held the monopoly on the of She traces the around that the used in their how it on the language of as well as a to the of than the Company themselves might they a of interest to the the of domestic was not on and The by of the themselves not as as it was not made of and in as of the to the While the was the into attempts to the economic by and While petitions offer evidence of interaction with the several articles focused on ways in which the state its was the subject of an article by who the of the from traces the and amongst London that the She points to the of that was the as London their special The and the she argues, were The out to the which with the as the were as an on was a response by the to what he saw as by the city and as a of An article by explores and sixteenth-century through a of The over a to who his to the the his to it shows how these to his that of would his over his (p. the of his The argues, also of law particularly those of while the of and have up in the and of early modern to new An article by the of the national law through the study of three of in Using from parish of household in in and with the of He finds that in 1604 the was than in the with more tightly into household groups across of the In attempts to were particularly in more of the city the the sought to themselves and

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic History Review
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13402
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of periodical literature for 2023: (iii) 1500–1700

Charmian Mansell
The Economic History Review
Historical Economic and Social Studies
article

Review of periodical literature for 2023: (iii) 1500–1700

Charmian Mansell
article en

Abstract

The year 2023 saw many publications in the fields of early modern economic and social history. The articles discussed in this round-up cover topics which have been a mainstay over recent years, including histories of labour (especially women's work), colonialism, and slavery. Agrarian history has lately gained renewed attention, and once again featured in this year's scholarship. A notable cluster of articles focused on what petitions – of which large collections survive – can tell us about the early modern economy, society, and the state. The gender split of authors was roughly equal this year, a testament to the rich and diverse topics that this year's articles cover. Labour history was the focus of several articles. The hiring of over 1000 unskilled workers for the rebuilding of St Paul's Cathedral in London between 1672 and 1748 is the subject of an article by Paker, Stephenson, and Wallis. Applying econometric analysis to records of labourers hired, the authors find that hiring practices ‘encouraged retention and reduced turnover, giving a core group of laborers more work, priority in rehiring after slowdowns, and access to additional ways to earn.’ (p. 1101). Over time, the share of ‘new’ workers (i.e. those who had not previously worked on St Paul's) fell (p. 1110). Casual, transient work was not the pattern of hiring here at St Paul's; rather, the length of time a worker had been employed was rewarded with additional labour opportunities. A synthesis of recent publications on work and identity is offered in an article by Hailwood and Waddell. In particular, the article draws attention to recent scholarship on the breadth of working identities that moves beyond categorizing people into ‘sorts’. The authors call for future scholarship which comparatively analyses types of sources (e.g. self-created versus indirect evidence) as well as how working identities might intersect with ‘time, place, gender, forms of labour, and race’ (p. 158). An article by McVitty contributes to this growing scholarship on work and identity. She exposes a pre-modern culture of sexual misconduct and gendered violence in the legal profession through close study of a range of legal records (court records, internal records of Inns of Court, and public proclamations) in fifteenth- and sixteenth-century England. While junior practitioners regularly participated in these behaviours, she argues, senior practitioners were responsible for condoning it (as well as sometimes participating) and shifting the blame to women. Although the legal community punished offenders, prosecution primarily sought to shield reputation and evade public consequences. Sexual misconduct and gendered violence contributed to the forging of tightly bound homosocial bonds that endure and persist within the legal profession today. To understand modern scandals of sexual misconduct within the common law profession, McVitty maintains, we must critically analyse inherited traditions. Articles on women's work have become a strength of early modern economic and social history in recent years. This year, three articles on care work were published. In the first, Shepard traces care work activities of ‘working mothers’ in London from 1675–1800. Identifying incidences of ‘nurse’ (and its variants) in the Proceedings of the Old Bailey Online, Shepard finds that care work was dispersed broadly across a range of women (and sometimes men) in a variety of arrangements. Both a ‘form of pragmatic provision’ and a ‘commercial endeavour’ (p. 18), it was by no means exclusively carried out by the birth mother. In a second article, Mansell also uses court records as a window onto care work. Taking a microhistorical approach, she traces the end-of-life care received by a seventeenth-century unmarried man in Herefordshire. Through the articulations of care work and its value made by the litigant parties and the witnesses who testified on their behalf, she argues that the labour of care – both remunerated and unpaid, and physical and emotional – was economically valued in early modern England. A third article by Fox and Brazier focuses on the profession of midwifery, placing the seventeenth-century oath that midwives were required to swear under the microscope. The authors show that the oaths – a legal instrument of regulation – reveal what was important to both birthing women and to parish authorities. As officeholders themselves, midwives were ‘active participants in state formation’ (p. 248), and the authors note their crucial role in establishing what we might today see as an ethical code of midwifery. A special issue on Scottish women's and gender history in The Scottish Historical Review this year contained three articles of interest to social and economic of the early modern period. The first, authored by Mason, focuses on women's property ownership. According to Scots law, a man could not sell property his wife brought to the marriage nor that jointly acquired during marriage without her consent. This consent was recorded by her signature on the deed and a private examination. Using a sample of approximately 1600 private examinations of seventeenth-century women in Glasgow, Inverness, and St Andrews, Mason questions how far the requirement of married women to consent to these sales constrained their husbands’ power over property. While we cannot know how many women were coerced into the private examination, Mason nonetheless argues that the procedure itself represents the legal importance placed on married women's consent in property transactions and the protection the courts offered them. Women did not hand over their consent freely, she finds. Many exchanged it for other property. Seventeenth-century married women, therefore, were not excluded from legal and economic processes. Sixteenth-century married women were the subject of an article in the same issue by Beattie (with Spence). The article explores the voluminous testamentary archive for sixteenth-century Scotland, finding that around one-third of wills were made by women. Through careful recategorization of those listed in the National Records for Scotland catalogue as ‘sometimes spouses’ from widows to married women, the authors show that wives made up the largest proportion of female testators. A sample of married women's wills shows that they rarely mentioned a husband's consent, were regularly able to bequeath their half or third portion of household goods, and that the clothing and jewellery they left could be extremely valuable. Significantly, the authors find that the women used language of community of property between husband and wife. A third article by Spence examines 2000 wills produced between 1560 and 1600. She argues that women who made wills were well aware of what was theirs to bequeath and that these documents should be read not just as formulaic or prescribed. Rather, they offer something of women's ‘voices’. Spence argues for three distinct ways in which these voices can be heard: firstly, in women naming their executors; second, in their instructions of how to care for children and stepchildren; and thirdly, through the items they left to others in the latter will and legacy sections of their testaments. Using wills from this perspective, she argues, shifts the focus away from other studies that show how women used their voices for ill to those who used their authoritative voices to advance the family position. An article by Brock sheds new light on women's relationship to early modern trade and empire in Asia. The article focuses on the mercantile activities of one woman – Martha Parker – who operated as a merchant with the East India Company (EIC) in the second half of the seventeenth century. She was not alone. Over 1300 women had commercial interactions with EIC between 1600 and 1757, Brock shows. Women's commercial networks and practices within the EIC were key in shaping the Company's structure. Particularly upon their husband's deaths, women were agents in expanding their personal and household economies, accessing networks and using their existing knowledge of trading companies and mercantile business. This was one of several articles this year that expanded our understanding of trade, mercantilism, and the global economy. An article by Bromley shifts our focus from ideas of the ‘centre city’ to the ‘centre country’ in thinking about transnational mercantile networks and global knowledge. Through a close study of trading company debates in the 1690s, the article positions mercantilism as ‘a process of interaction between private interests that stretched beyond London across England and the wider world’ (p. 748). Global knowledge, Bromley finds, was not limited to England's port cities, or domestic/overseas sites held by colonial administrators or Companies. Contribution to public interest, he argues, was asserted ‘by drawing links between private interests and national employment’ (p. 771) and a trade's capacity to support domestic employment. He draws attention to the importance of the middling sorts’ economic beliefs, expressed through the documents they left behind and particularly petitions (a source which we will see attracted great attention this year). The 1604 Treaty of London and the ending of the Anglo-Spanish War was the subject of an article by Gajda. In this article, Gajda sheds light on the importance of merchants’ economic concerns scaffolded in the treaty. She points to the multi-layered and often competing interests of different mercantile groups. Some sought to recover finances lost through war, while others had directly benefited from war. Gadja closely analyses the manuscript tracts produced in making way for peace and is attentive to the lobbies made on both sides to the commissioners for peace negotiations by both individuals and companies. She argues that their attempts to influence the terms of the treaty ‘heralded a new and highly significant indicator of the wider public and central role that commercial concerns now held and would continue to play in the mainstream political life of the nation’ (p. 466). Merchants were also the subject of a piece by Papini. Her study of the accounts of Italian portraitist Antonio Franchi concentrates on the high volume of business he received in the late seventeenth century from British merchants and captains living and working in the port city of Livorno and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. She finds that, despite being notoriously expensive in Livorno, Franchi charged more favourable rates for his portraits than English painters. Meanwhile, the swelling British maritime community in Livorno and Tuscany encouraged artists to move to and work there. The navigation and operation of trade was also the subject of several articles. Jopling questions the usefulness of the term ‘Jamaica discipline’ to describe a set of ideas followed by Anglo-American privateering and pirate groups in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Jopling contests the received narrative that these groups were egalitarian and anti-authoritarian, highlighting instead fragmentation and core differences amongst privateers and pirates. He points to evidence of their intentions to embed themselves within colonial society to legitimize their activities. The social norms these groups adhered to were flexible and inconsistent, rather than constituting any kind of Jamaica discipline. In an article for a forum titled ‘Risk and Uncertainty in the Early Modern World’ published in the same journal, Reid focuses on ideas of risk and profit in British Atlantic merchant shipping. Evolutionary – rather than revolutionary – shifts in shipping technology characterize the British Atlantic maritime economy, he argues. The size of ships, for example, remained consistent throughout the period 1600–1800 due to risk associated with large ships travelling at speed. Instead, fleets grew to ensure the maritime economy remained buoyant. Reid argues for technological conservatism in explaining productivity of British merchant shipping. An article by Ruderman and van Waijenburg explores the revocation of the Royal African Company's (RAC) monopoly in 1698, and particularly the Company's response to its loss in trading privileges. The authors code and analyse the highly systematized format (including stock phrases and repeated commands) of an almost complete set of by the to its captains on to between and into the Company's many of which beyond the of the on the revocation of the the authors find that the Company operated with high both and to and new for more of the trade in African The of the trade itself – captains who the African – could be to the activities of the agents at African and evidence of the Company in the of the of the The the authors to their they to The navigation of also featured in an article by which explores the of legal by English in between legal on the one practices of and (including in which to the or rather than a on the and other legal argues that, through legal as and also their in the English of the on for almost a the shifts made in their of in with English law and terms on which the state with out new and new within the and of (p. This year was a year for articles on global and colonial The labour that the trade upon was the of an article by The that the that labour in English colonial from to The and of and was a of English from as early as the and the of the of in This was not a in a colonial labour he argues. Rather, it was a of access to African An article by draws out important in how the was in to that – to and – the while the who African or for labour and who at their and hiring themselves out as they could be as being than a This argues, into the of an working in England. An article by British of through a study of (including and between and argues that these ideas about in with a that from children to and (p. interest to social and economic is that, for of these and and future (p. while offer for economically has left these and for economic was also the subject of an article by The article focuses on the of a on St a Atlantic the of traces the in of an economic on and labour In St they and argues, of wider He of beyond the of in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. An article by the between and The English for she argues, was a key in English as a for the should be equal importance to the of in the importance of in the society (with for and for and as a from court and records, and narrative sources in from the century into the of English by Early modern histories and histories of the produced a of articles this An article by focused on in drawing new attention to the importance of and the in of and of shows that, by the the of the city had of of the in and around and its into as the An article by a of property of through the of between and The article argues that the of – the could the of a into its as well as the themselves – property in this period. Although was under rates of nonetheless and its the to and a property. The argues, as a means to its that this was were which had economic upon the as the of its Agrarian was the subject of an article by who uses and to embed ideas of and within and seventeenth-century He argues that a in around how should be at the of the seventeenth century. – which ideas of household or within a community – was by a more of and between and the state was by the century. labourers were from the as of (p. rather than of the household articles by the subject of early modern on The article, published in The Historical a close study of over in over in existing of new and of finds that an within early modern English economic (p. argues that, far from being to economic they of a from a society in which was on ideas of community was by ideas of social and to The second article, in the of these same and at through the of shows that the over the interests of private of who were in had a to the – as she argues, they did not or The of it out as the social and the of the A of articles focused on the of the early modern received renewed attention in an article by not on signature on left on the in by those would have Hailwood draws our attention to of that tell us something more about and practices in a society of In particular, he points to the more of he terms and Over recent years, has been an focus on early modern An article by and sheds new light on and practices through the sixteenth-century accounts of of one of England's and show that in was with mercantile well into The article new evidence of how a to early English power through and a A second article by these authors with and a to understand and its in early modern The article and to an using early modern records from a The authors set out to was in the and how did it (p. The article out the process of the and the The they had an by volume of and an of to modern these as new due to in the the authors that was an important source of in early modern England than other and that – several were being – had the to significant The of offered a for the close study of over in the of by The the of those in and in that in were the of the and from across the and its The draws out to to the of being to merchants from the and household in the was the focus of an article published by She a for from using a that accounts for of household over The for the period that closely with those on She as a indicator of living and Both for this argues, on followed the of that the of the household over time had on the of brought a in household away from and and This the and of living to from of making his for the period. and of living was also the focus of an article by Waddell. He explores the of and what it means in early modern history by placing the economic of the under the economic with of late and the the economic of the and in this us to be in the late seventeenth century as a of and economic In the of economic and social early modern society have the power of early modern has been its in recent years, with scholarship expanding in using it as window onto of An article by explores the of through a sample of produced petitions from and between and She argues that, rather than these petitions as to the that was in the seventeenth they tell a of both identity and support as well as and their while also themselves out as individuals in their and through should be as she argues, and both our understanding of An article by also petitions as a source for early modern to scholarship on of a of petitions from between and recorded living while She focuses on or wives who remained in with their and used as a means to from their The article sheds light on the that these women to how they with and the within society of also featured in an article by and Wallis. petitions by to the for early with the records of the the article explores the of as well as for in company of the petitions shows that from within the city and with to the company more made of the The authors find the court was used in of and between and and that court were not to the could in the might female who were working for the wife as of the Company did not in the The authors a in the records and of with by companies around in (and more for female The in petitions is in article on the monopoly of in early seventeenth century England. explores the operation and of through a made by the Company in with the support of the of London the who held the monopoly on the of She traces the around that the used in their how it on the language of as well as a to the of than the Company themselves might they a of interest to the the of domestic was not on and The by of the themselves not as as it was not made of and in as of the to the While the was the into attempts to the economic by and While petitions offer evidence of interaction with the several articles focused on ways in which the state its was the subject of an article by who the of the from traces the and amongst London that the She points to the of that was the as London their special The and the she argues, were The out to the which with the as the were as an on was a response by the to what he saw as by the city and as a of An article by explores and sixteenth-century through a of The over a to who his to the the his to it shows how these to his that of would his over his (p. the of his The argues, also of law particularly those of while the of and have up in the and of early modern to new An article by the of the national law through the study of three of in Using from parish of household in in and with the of He finds that in 1604 the was than in the with more tightly into household groups across of the In attempts to were particularly in more of the city the the sought to themselves and

The Economic History ReviewVol. 78(1)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Historical Economic and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.