Geodesic Distance Integration in Analytical Frameworks for Aquifer Hydraulic Modeling

Abstract Traditional analytical models in groundwater studies often simplify the complexities arising from spatial variations in aquifer geometry and anisotropy, limiting their ability to capture the full theoretical nuances of groundwater flow. In this study, we present a novel methodology that integrates geodesic distances within the intrinsic geometry of confined, constant‐thickness aquifers, while also accounting for directional anisotropy in hydraulic properties. This approach provides a rigorous mathematical framework for accurately capturing the true distances along the aquifer geometry between pumping and observation wells, in contrast to traditional Euclidean distances. Our methodology is compatible with various analytical solutions, including the Theis (1935, https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.1965.1.3.9 ) and Papadopulos and Cooper (1967, https://doi.org/10.1029/wr003i001p00241 ) solutions, extending their theoretical applicability to more complex aquifer geometries and anisotropic conditions. Numerical simulations of synthetic examples illustrate the theoretical consistency of the proposed approach, aligning drawdown patterns within this advanced framework. While primarily focused on enhancing existing analytical models, this methodology sets the stage for future theoretical advances in groundwater modeling, offering a conceptual expansion of analytical solutions to better address geometric and anisotropic complexities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr038316
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geodesic Distance Integration in Analytical Frameworks for Aquifer Hydraulic Modeling

Eungyu Park, Zhang Wen, Peipei Xue, Huali Chen
1 citations
Water Resources Research
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.21
article

Geodesic Distance Integration in Analytical Frameworks for Aquifer Hydraulic Modeling

Eungyu Park, Zhang Wen, Peipei Xue, Huali Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Traditional analytical models in groundwater studies often simplify the complexities arising from spatial variations in aquifer geometry and anisotropy, limiting their ability to capture the full theoretical nuances of groundwater flow. In this study, we present a novel methodology that integrates geodesic distances within the intrinsic geometry of confined, constant‐thickness aquifers, while also accounting for directional anisotropy in hydraulic properties. This approach provides a rigorous mathematical framework for accurately capturing the true distances along the aquifer geometry between pumping and observation wells, in contrast to traditional Euclidean distances. Our methodology is compatible with various analytical solutions, including the Theis (1935, https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.1965.1.3.9 ) and Papadopulos and Cooper (1967, https://doi.org/10.1029/wr003i001p00241 ) solutions, extending their theoretical applicability to more complex aquifer geometries and anisotropic conditions. Numerical simulations of synthetic examples illustrate the theoretical consistency of the proposed approach, aligning drawdown patterns within this advanced framework. While primarily focused on enhancing existing analytical models, this methodology sets the stage for future theoretical advances in groundwater modeling, offering a conceptual expansion of analytical solutions to better address geometric and anisotropic complexities.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 60(12)
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), Kyungpook National University (KR), Zhejiang Gongshang University (CN)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.