Investigation of Preknowledge Cheating via Joint Hierarchical Modeling Patterns of Response Accuracy and Response Time

As computer-based testing becomes more prevalent, the attention paid to response time (RT) in assessment practice and psychometric research correspondingly increases. This study explores the rate of Type I error in detecting preknowledge cheating behaviors, the power of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence measure, and the L person fit statistic under various conditions by modeling patterns of response accuracy (RA) and RT using a joint hierarchical model. Four design factors were manipulated: test length, the difficulty level of compromised items, the ratio of compromised items, and variations in the RTs for these compromised items. The results indicate that the KL measure consistently exhibits higher power and Type I error rates than the person fit statistics [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] across all RA and RT patterns and under all conditions. Furthermore, the KL measure demonstrates the greatest power at a medium test length.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241297946
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of Preknowledge Cheating via Joint Hierarchical Modeling Patterns of Response Accuracy and Response Time

Ebru BALTA, Celal Deha Doğan
2 citations
SAGE Open
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
1.42
article

Investigation of Preknowledge Cheating via Joint Hierarchical Modeling Patterns of Response Accuracy and Response Time

Ebru BALTA, Celal Deha Doğan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As computer-based testing becomes more prevalent, the attention paid to response time (RT) in assessment practice and psychometric research correspondingly increases. This study explores the rate of Type I error in detecting preknowledge cheating behaviors, the power of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence measure, and the L person fit statistic under various conditions by modeling patterns of response accuracy (RA) and RT using a joint hierarchical model. Four design factors were manipulated: test length, the difficulty level of compromised items, the ratio of compromised items, and variations in the RTs for these compromised items. The results indicate that the KL measure consistently exhibits higher power and Type I error rates than the person fit statistics [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] across all RA and RT patterns and under all conditions. Furthermore, the KL measure demonstrates the greatest power at a medium test length.

SAGE OpenVol. 14(4)
Ankara University (TR), Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigation of Preknowledge Cheating via Joint Hierarchical Modeling Patterns of Response Accuracy and Response Time — Ebru BALTA, Celal Deha Doğan · SAGE Open (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS