Distinguishing fashion consciousness from fashion involvement: review and survey

Purpose Despite the large corpus of literature on fashion consciousness (FC) and fashion involvement (FI), both terms are often used synonymously, resulting in conflicting or mixed results. We address this limitation by offering a critical analysis of FC and FI, with a specific focus on their measurements. Design/methodology/approach A snowball sample survey of 720 respondents were conducted for factor analysis aimed at assessing reliability and validity. Specifically, following discriminant and concurrent validity between FC and FI. Findings Our empirical research underscores the clear distinction between FC and FI in terms of their theoretical definitions and measurements. We strongly discourage their use as interchangeable/synonymous terms or use of other potentially related terminology. Originality/value Our contribution clarifies the differences between FI and FC. While acknowledging that authors may resort to linguistic repetition in their discourse, we advocate for consistently using the precise terms “fashion involvement” and “fashion consciousness” whenever feasible. This study has the potential to inform future knowledge development and literature reviews in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-01-2024-0013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing fashion consciousness from fashion involvement: review and survey

Ana Julia Büttner, Suzane Strehlau
1 citations
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
5.06
article

Distinguishing fashion consciousness from fashion involvement: review and survey

Ana Julia Büttner, Suzane Strehlau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Despite the large corpus of literature on fashion consciousness (FC) and fashion involvement (FI), both terms are often used synonymously, resulting in conflicting or mixed results. We address this limitation by offering a critical analysis of FC and FI, with a specific focus on their measurements. Design/methodology/approach A snowball sample survey of 720 respondents were conducted for factor analysis aimed at assessing reliability and validity. Specifically, following discriminant and concurrent validity between FC and FI. Findings Our empirical research underscores the clear distinction between FC and FI in terms of their theoretical definitions and measurements. We strongly discourage their use as interchangeable/synonymous terms or use of other potentially related terminology. Originality/value Our contribution clarifies the differences between FI and FC. While acknowledging that authors may resort to linguistic repetition in their discourse, we advocate for consistently using the precise terms “fashion involvement” and “fashion consciousness” whenever feasible. This study has the potential to inform future knowledge development and literature reviews in the field.

Journal of Fashion Marketing and ManagementVol. 29(3)
Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
5.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.