Hardness Comparison of Single-Shade vs Multi-Shade Dental Resin Nano-Composite

Shade matching of multi-shade dental resin nano-composite is a process that requires time and operator expertise. Single-shade universal composite resin claimed to match all tooth colors to simplify the process. Comprehensive testing, including an assessment of surface hardness, is needed to evaluate the properties of this relatively new single-shade universal composite and to evaluate the surface hardness of single-shade universal composite compared to multi-shade dental resin nano-composite. This experimental study tested two composite restorative materials: single-shade universal composite (Omnichroma, Tokuyama Dental, Japan) and nanofilled composite resin (FiltekTM Z350 XT, 3M/ESPE, USA). Thirty specimens divided into 2 groups (n=15) were fabricated by placing the composites into a stainless steel mold (2 mm thick × 12 mm diameter) and photoactivated for 20 seconds, followed by finishing and polishing. Surface hardness was evaluated using a Vickers hardness testing machine and a diamond indenter with a load of 1000 g applied for 15 seconds. Data were analyzed by using an independent t-test. The mean surface hardness of single-shade universal and multi-shade dental resin nano-composite were 21.04±4,92 and 19.33±5,61 Vickers hardness number (VHN), respectively. Single-shade universal composite showed no significant difference in surface hardness to multi-shade dental resin nano-composite (p-value 0.05). The surface hardness value of single-shade universal composite resin was comparable to multi-shade dental resin nano-composite.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insisiva Dental Journal Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Insisiva
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18196/di.v13i2.22801
Primary Topic
Scientific and Engineering Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hardness Comparison of Single-Shade vs Multi-Shade Dental Resin Nano-Composite

Bebbi Arisya Kesumaputri, Danica Anastasia, Martha Mozartha, Ananda Haura Nuradnin
1 links
Insisiva Dental Journal Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Insisiva
Scientific and Engineering Research Topics
article

Hardness Comparison of Single-Shade vs Multi-Shade Dental Resin Nano-Composite

Bebbi Arisya Kesumaputri, Danica Anastasia, Martha Mozartha, Ananda Haura Nuradnin
article en

Abstract

Shade matching of multi-shade dental resin nano-composite is a process that requires time and operator expertise. Single-shade universal composite resin claimed to match all tooth colors to simplify the process. Comprehensive testing, including an assessment of surface hardness, is needed to evaluate the properties of this relatively new single-shade universal composite and to evaluate the surface hardness of single-shade universal composite compared to multi-shade dental resin nano-composite. This experimental study tested two composite restorative materials: single-shade universal composite (Omnichroma, Tokuyama Dental, Japan) and nanofilled composite resin (FiltekTM Z350 XT, 3M/ESPE, USA). Thirty specimens divided into 2 groups (n=15) were fabricated by placing the composites into a stainless steel mold (2 mm thick × 12 mm diameter) and photoactivated for 20 seconds, followed by finishing and polishing. Surface hardness was evaluated using a Vickers hardness testing machine and a diamond indenter with a load of 1000 g applied for 15 seconds. Data were analyzed by using an independent t-test. The mean surface hardness of single-shade universal and multi-shade dental resin nano-composite were 21.04±4,92 and 19.33±5,61 Vickers hardness number (VHN), respectively. Single-shade universal composite showed no significant difference in surface hardness to multi-shade dental resin nano-composite (p-value 0.05). The surface hardness value of single-shade universal composite resin was comparable to multi-shade dental resin nano-composite.

Insisiva Dental Journal Majalah Kedokteran Gigi InsisivaVol. 13(2)
Sriwijaya University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Scientific and Engineering Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hardness Comparison of Single-Shade vs Multi-Shade Dental Resin Nano-Composite — Bebbi Arisya Kesumaputri, Danica Anastasia, et al. · Insisiva Dental Journal Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Insisiva (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS