Manipulation cases in free will and moral responsibility, part 2: Manipulator‐focused responses

In this paper-Part 2 of 3-we discuss one of the two main types of soft-line responses to manipulation cases, which we refer to as manipulator-focused views. Manipulator-focused views hold, roughly, that the reason that Victim lacks responsibility (or lacks full responsibility) is because of the way the action is related to the Manipulator. First, we introduce these views generally, and then we survey some detailed versions of such views. We then introduce cases of natural forces, often taken to be a problem for such approaches in general, followed by a discussion of various sorts of cases-accidental results, lucky manipulators, and parallel cases-that present challenges for some of the detailed versions of such views. We conclude with some thoughts about the prospects for manipulator-focused views going forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Compass
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manipulation cases in free will and moral responsibility, part 2: Manipulator‐focused responses

Gabriel De Marco, Taylor W. Cyr
1 citations
Philosophy Compass
Free Will and Agency
0.34
article

Manipulation cases in free will and moral responsibility, part 2: Manipulator‐focused responses

Gabriel De Marco, Taylor W. Cyr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper-Part 2 of 3-we discuss one of the two main types of soft-line responses to manipulation cases, which we refer to as manipulator-focused views. Manipulator-focused views hold, roughly, that the reason that Victim lacks responsibility (or lacks full responsibility) is because of the way the action is related to the Manipulator. First, we introduce these views generally, and then we survey some detailed versions of such views. We then introduce cases of natural forces, often taken to be a problem for such approaches in general, followed by a discussion of various sorts of cases-accidental results, lucky manipulators, and parallel cases-that present challenges for some of the detailed versions of such views. We conclude with some thoughts about the prospects for manipulator-focused views going forward.

Philosophy CompassVol. 19(12)
University of Oxford (GB), Samford University (US)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 European Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Free Will and Agency
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Manipulation cases in free will and moral responsibility, part 2: Manipulator‐focused responses — Gabriel De Marco, Taylor W. Cyr · Philosophy Compass (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS