ENHANCING FRAUD DETECTION AND ANOMALY DETECTION IN RETAIL BANKING USING GENERATIVE AI AND MACHINE LEARNING MODELS

This study investigates the effectiveness of generative models and traditional classification models in detecting fraud and anomalies within the retail banking sector. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) were evaluated for their capability to generate realistic synthetic transaction data and identify anomalies, achieving anomaly detection accuracies of 91.2% and 93.5%, respectively. These models were also assessed using Inception Score and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), with GANs exhibiting superior data realism. Among classification models, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 96.3%, a precision of 93.5%, a recall of 91.4%, and an AUC-ROC of 97.2%. Random Forest and Logistic Regression also performed well, though with slightly lower metrics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of networks and security
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55640/ijns-04-01-07
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ENHANCING FRAUD DETECTION AND ANOMALY DETECTION IN RETAIL BANKING USING GENERATIVE AI AND MACHINE LEARNING MODELS

Ashequr Rahman, Asif Iqbal, Emon Ahmed, Tanvirah medshuvo et al.
6 citations
International journal of networks and security
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
2.08
article

ENHANCING FRAUD DETECTION AND ANOMALY DETECTION IN RETAIL BANKING USING GENERATIVE AI AND MACHINE LEARNING MODELS

Ashequr Rahman, Asif Iqbal, Emon Ahmed, Tanvirah medshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain Ontor
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of generative models and traditional classification models in detecting fraud and anomalies within the retail banking sector. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) were evaluated for their capability to generate realistic synthetic transaction data and identify anomalies, achieving anomaly detection accuracies of 91.2% and 93.5%, respectively. These models were also assessed using Inception Score and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), with GANs exhibiting superior data realism. Among classification models, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 96.3%, a precision of 93.5%, a recall of 91.4%, and an AUC-ROC of 97.2%. Random Forest and Logistic Regression also performed well, though with slightly lower metrics.

International journal of networks and securityVol. 04(01)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
2.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.