Impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramics and resin cement

Pre-etching ceramic restorations in dental laboratories is preferred by numerous dentists due to the potential health concerns associated with handling hydrofluoric acid (HF) if not managed correctly. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between lithium disilicate ceramics and self-adhesive resin cement. For this study, a total of 60 IPS e. max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent) lithium disilicate specimens were prepared. Specimens were randomly divided into six groups, with 10 specimens per each. Different surface treatments were applied (1: Control group no surface treatment (C); 2: 10% hydrofluoric with silane coupling agent (HFS); 3: 10% hydrofluoric acid only (HF); 4: Sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum-oxide powder (AO); 5: Sandblasting with 30 μm silica-coated aluminum-oxide powder (SC), and 6: Er,Cr:YSGG laser (L). SBS tests were performed, and data analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons. The difference between the mean average of SBS was statistically significant among all different surface treatments ( p ≤ 0.05) except for the L group with a ( p = 1.00). The highest mean value was observed in the HFS followed by the HF group. Whereas the L group showed no statistical significance in comparison with the C group ( p > 0.05). Hydrofluoric acid etching in combination with a silane coupling agent was the most effective surface treatment for bonding lithium disilicate ceramics with resin cement. In contrast, laser irradiation was the least effective among all other groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Materials
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2024.1496749
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramics and resin cement

Abdulaziz Binrayes, Ghada Alrabeah, Syed Rashid Habib, Farah Nasser Alrajhi et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Materials
Dental materials and restorations
1.21
article

Impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramics and resin cement

Abdulaziz Binrayes, Ghada Alrabeah, Syed Rashid Habib, Farah Nasser Alrajhi, Reem F. Alhamid, Buthainah A. Alamer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Pre-etching ceramic restorations in dental laboratories is preferred by numerous dentists due to the potential health concerns associated with handling hydrofluoric acid (HF) if not managed correctly. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between lithium disilicate ceramics and self-adhesive resin cement. For this study, a total of 60 IPS e. max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent) lithium disilicate specimens were prepared. Specimens were randomly divided into six groups, with 10 specimens per each. Different surface treatments were applied (1: Control group no surface treatment (C); 2: 10% hydrofluoric with silane coupling agent (HFS); 3: 10% hydrofluoric acid only (HF); 4: Sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum-oxide powder (AO); 5: Sandblasting with 30 μm silica-coated aluminum-oxide powder (SC), and 6: Er,Cr:YSGG laser (L). SBS tests were performed, and data analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons. The difference between the mean average of SBS was statistically significant among all different surface treatments ( p ≤ 0.05) except for the L group with a ( p = 1.00). The highest mean value was observed in the HFS followed by the HF group. Whereas the L group showed no statistical significance in comparison with the C group ( p > 0.05). Hydrofluoric acid etching in combination with a silane coupling agent was the most effective surface treatment for bonding lithium disilicate ceramics with resin cement. In contrast, laser irradiation was the least effective among all other groups.

Frontiers in MaterialsVol. 11
King Saud University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Dental materials and restorations
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.