Application of ChatGPT as a content generation tool in continuing medical education: acne as a test topic

The large language model (LLM) ChatGPT can answer open-ended and complex questions, but its accuracy in providing reliable medical information requires a careful assessment. As part of the AI-CHECK (Artificial Intelligence for CME Health E-learning Contents and Knowledge) study, aimed at evaluating the potential of ChatGPT in continuous medical education (CME), we compared ChatGPT-generated educational content to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on acne vulgaris. ChatGPT version 4 was exposed to a 23-item questionnaire developed by an experienced dermatologist. A panel of five dermatologists rated the answers positively in terms of "quality" (87.8%), "readability" (94.8%), "accuracy" (75.7%), "thoroughness" (85.2%), and "consistency" with guidelines (76.8%). The references provided by ChatGPT obtained positive ratings for "pertinence" (94.6%), "relevance" (91.2%), and "update" (62.3%). The internal reproducibility was adequate both for answers (93.5%) and references (67.4%). Answers related to issues of uncertainty and/or controversy in the scientific community scored the lowest. This study underscores the need to develop rigorous evaluation criteria for AI-generated medical content and for expert oversight to ensure accuracy and guideline adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatology Reports
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2024.10138
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of ChatGPT as a content generation tool in continuing medical education: acne as a test topic

Silvia Emendi, Vincenzo Bettoli, Monica Ponzano, Sergio Cima et al.
Dermatology Reports
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Application of ChatGPT as a content generation tool in continuing medical education: acne as a test topic

Silvia Emendi, Vincenzo Bettoli, Monica Ponzano, Sergio Cima, Nicoletta Scarpa, Simone Cazzaniga, Fortunato Cassalia, Pietro Dri, Maria Rosa Valetto, Luigi Naldi, Eugenio Santoro, Anna Bolzon, Andrea Danese
article en

Abstract

The large language model (LLM) ChatGPT can answer open-ended and complex questions, but its accuracy in providing reliable medical information requires a careful assessment. As part of the AI-CHECK (Artificial Intelligence for CME Health E-learning Contents and Knowledge) study, aimed at evaluating the potential of ChatGPT in continuous medical education (CME), we compared ChatGPT-generated educational content to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on acne vulgaris. ChatGPT version 4 was exposed to a 23-item questionnaire developed by an experienced dermatologist. A panel of five dermatologists rated the answers positively in terms of "quality" (87.8%), "readability" (94.8%), "accuracy" (75.7%), "thoroughness" (85.2%), and "consistency" with guidelines (76.8%). The references provided by ChatGPT obtained positive ratings for "pertinence" (94.6%), "relevance" (91.2%), and "update" (62.3%). The internal reproducibility was adequate both for answers (93.5%) and references (67.4%). Answers related to issues of uncertainty and/or controversy in the scientific community scored the lowest. This study underscores the need to develop rigorous evaluation criteria for AI-generated medical content and for expert oversight to ensure accuracy and guideline adherence.

Dermatology ReportsVol. 17(2)
University of Verona (IT), Centro Studi GISED (IT), University of Padua (IT), Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Zadig (Italy) (IT), Ospedale San Bortolo (IT), Chongqing Electromechanical Holdings (China) (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.