Application of ChatGPT as a content generation tool in continuing medical education: acne as a test topic
The large language model (LLM) ChatGPT can answer open-ended and complex questions, but its accuracy in providing reliable medical information requires a careful assessment. As part of the AI-CHECK (Artificial Intelligence for CME Health E-learning Contents and Knowledge) study, aimed at evaluating the potential of ChatGPT in continuous medical education (CME), we compared ChatGPT-generated educational content to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on acne vulgaris. ChatGPT version 4 was exposed to a 23-item questionnaire developed by an experienced dermatologist. A panel of five dermatologists rated the answers positively in terms of "quality" (87.8%), "readability" (94.8%), "accuracy" (75.7%), "thoroughness" (85.2%), and "consistency" with guidelines (76.8%). The references provided by ChatGPT obtained positive ratings for "pertinence" (94.6%), "relevance" (91.2%), and "update" (62.3%). The internal reproducibility was adequate both for answers (93.5%) and references (67.4%). Answers related to issues of uncertainty and/or controversy in the scientific community scored the lowest. This study underscores the need to develop rigorous evaluation criteria for AI-generated medical content and for expert oversight to ensure accuracy and guideline adherence.
Authors
- Silvia Emendi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9065-4823)
- Vincenzo Bettoli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-4600)
- Monica Ponzano
- Sergio Cima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7570-7639)
- Nicoletta Scarpa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8120-6923)
- Simone Cazzaniga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-6138)
- Fortunato Cassalia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5014-1122)
- Pietro Dri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-4787)
- Maria Rosa Valetto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5195-5208)
- Luigi Naldi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3160-2835)
- Eugenio Santoro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-9896)
- Anna Bolzon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1626-0855)
- Andrea Danese (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8656-2927)
Institutions
- University of Verona (IT)
- Centro Studi GISED (IT)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
- University of Ferrara (IT)
- University Hospital of Bern (CH)
- Zadig (Italy) (IT)
- Ospedale San Bortolo (IT)
- Chongqing Electromechanical Holdings (China) (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Dermatology Reports
- Published
- 2024-11-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2024.10138
- Primary Topic
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00