The sparse(st) optimization problem: reformulations, optimality, stationarity, and numerical results

Abstract We consider the sparse optimization problem with nonlinear constraints and an objective function, which is given by the sum of a general smooth mapping and an additional term defined by the $$ \ell _0 $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> -quasi-norm. This term is used to obtain sparse solutions, but difficult to handle due to its nonconvexity and nonsmoothness (the sparsity-improving term is even discontinuous). The aim of this paper is to present two reformulations of this program as a smooth nonlinear program with complementarity-type constraints. We show that these programs are equivalent in terms of local and global minima and introduce a problem-tailored stationarity concept, which turns out to coincide with the standard KKT conditions of the two reformulated problems. In addition, a suitable constraint qualification as well as second-order conditions for the sparse optimization problem are investigated. These are then used to show that three Lagrange–Newton-type methods are locally fast convergent. Numerical results on different classes of test problems indicate that these methods can be used to drastically improve sparse solutions obtained by some other (globally convergent) methods for sparse optimization problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Optimization and Applications
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-024-00625-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The sparse(st) optimization problem: reformulations, optimality, stationarity, and numerical results

Christian Kanzow, Alexandra Schwartz, Felix Weiß
1 citations
Computational Optimization and Applications
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
0.37
article

The sparse(st) optimization problem: reformulations, optimality, stationarity, and numerical results

Christian Kanzow, Alexandra Schwartz, Felix Weiß
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We consider the sparse optimization problem with nonlinear constraints and an objective function, which is given by the sum of a general smooth mapping and an additional term defined by the $$ \ell _0 $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> -quasi-norm. This term is used to obtain sparse solutions, but difficult to handle due to its nonconvexity and nonsmoothness (the sparsity-improving term is even discontinuous). The aim of this paper is to present two reformulations of this program as a smooth nonlinear program with complementarity-type constraints. We show that these programs are equivalent in terms of local and global minima and introduce a problem-tailored stationarity concept, which turns out to coincide with the standard KKT conditions of the two reformulated problems. In addition, a suitable constraint qualification as well as second-order conditions for the sparse optimization problem are investigated. These are then used to show that three Lagrange–Newton-type methods are locally fast convergent. Numerical results on different classes of test problems indicate that these methods can be used to drastically improve sparse solutions obtained by some other (globally convergent) methods for sparse optimization problems.

Computational Optimization and ApplicationsVol. 90(1)
University of Würzburg (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.