How to Make a Difference in the Anthropocene? On Stiegler’s Call for Bifurcation

Abstract Characterizing the contemporary world as massively entropic and pointing to the proletarianization of human beings, Bernard Stiegler claims that we need to “bifurcate”. This paper clarifies what he means by bifurcation and examines the conditions necessary for its occurrence. After explaining how Stiegler’s general organology provides a framework for his assessment of our present, the paper focuses on how humans can become capable of producing bifurcations. Emphasizing that bifurcation must occur in relation to technology, the paper identifies it as an inventive dis-closure of a current system that transforms both technology and us through the creation of knowledge. It then shows that although the problem of our time is primarily one of automatization, we must deal with it through internalization rather than disautomatization. Our very humanity is being disrupted because we are not realizing the possibilities offered by the development of technology, and this can only be achieved if we internalize technology. The process of internalizing technology is itself bifurcative and enables us to overcome our proletarianization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00824-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Make a Difference in the Anthropocene? On Stiegler’s Call for Bifurcation

Martin Ritter
3 citations
Philosophy & Technology
Digital Media and Philosophy
1.24
article

How to Make a Difference in the Anthropocene? On Stiegler’s Call for Bifurcation

Martin Ritter
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Characterizing the contemporary world as massively entropic and pointing to the proletarianization of human beings, Bernard Stiegler claims that we need to “bifurcate”. This paper clarifies what he means by bifurcation and examines the conditions necessary for its occurrence. After explaining how Stiegler’s general organology provides a framework for his assessment of our present, the paper focuses on how humans can become capable of producing bifurcations. Emphasizing that bifurcation must occur in relation to technology, the paper identifies it as an inventive dis-closure of a current system that transforms both technology and us through the creation of knowledge. It then shows that although the problem of our time is primarily one of automatization, we must deal with it through internalization rather than disautomatization. Our very humanity is being disrupted because we are not realizing the possibilities offered by the development of technology, and this can only be achieved if we internalize technology. The process of internalizing technology is itself bifurcative and enables us to overcome our proletarianization.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 37(4)
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy (CZ)
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Digital Media and Philosophy
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.