Allocation and validation of the second revision of the International Staging System in the ICARIA-MM and IKEMA studies

The International Staging System for multiple myeloma recently underwent a second revision (R2-ISS) to include gain/amplification of 1q21 and account for the additive prognostic significance of multiple high-risk features. The phase 3 ICARIA-MM (isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone vs. pomalidomide-dexamethasone) and IKEMA (isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs. carfilzomib-dexamethasone) studies provide large datasets for retrospectively validating the prognostic value of the R2-ISS in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Of 609 pooled patients, 68 (11.2%) were reclassified as R2-ISS stage I, 136 (22.3%) as R2-ISS stage II, 204 (33.5%) as R2-ISS stage III, 55 (9.0%) as stage IV, and 146 (24.0%) "Not classified". Median progression-free survival was shorter among those reclassified as R2-ISS stage II (HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.979-2.358), stage III (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.709-3.923), and stage IV (HR 3.51, 95% CI 2.124-5.784) versus stage I. Adding isatuximab led to longer progression-free survival versus doublet therapy (adjusted HR 0.544 [95% CI 0.436-0.680]), with a consistent treatment effect observed across all R2-ISS stages. This is the first study to validate the R2-ISS with novel agents, including anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, and to show that R2-ISS, as a prognostic scoring system, can be applied to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01149-w
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allocation and validation of the second revision of the International Staging System in the ICARIA-MM and IKEMA studies

Pieter Sonneveld, Mattia D’Agostino, Zandra Klippel, Keisuke Tada et al.
5 citations
Blood Cancer Journal
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
2.27
article

Allocation and validation of the second revision of the International Staging System in the ICARIA-MM and IKEMA studies

Pieter Sonneveld, Mattia D’Agostino, Zandra Klippel, Keisuke Tada, Ivan Špıčka, Paul Gerard Guy Richardson, Helgi van de Velde, Rick Zhang, Marcelo Capra, Joseph Mıkhael, Thomas G. Martin, Christina Tekle, Sandrine Macé, Meral Beksaç, Kamlesh Bisht, Aurore Perrot, Philippe Moreau, Taro Fukao
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The International Staging System for multiple myeloma recently underwent a second revision (R2-ISS) to include gain/amplification of 1q21 and account for the additive prognostic significance of multiple high-risk features. The phase 3 ICARIA-MM (isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone vs. pomalidomide-dexamethasone) and IKEMA (isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs. carfilzomib-dexamethasone) studies provide large datasets for retrospectively validating the prognostic value of the R2-ISS in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Of 609 pooled patients, 68 (11.2%) were reclassified as R2-ISS stage I, 136 (22.3%) as R2-ISS stage II, 204 (33.5%) as R2-ISS stage III, 55 (9.0%) as stage IV, and 146 (24.0%) "Not classified". Median progression-free survival was shorter among those reclassified as R2-ISS stage II (HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.979-2.358), stage III (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.709-3.923), and stage IV (HR 3.51, 95% CI 2.124-5.784) versus stage I. Adding isatuximab led to longer progression-free survival versus doublet therapy (adjusted HR 0.544 [95% CI 0.436-0.680]), with a consistent treatment effect observed across all R2-ISS stages. This is the first study to validate the R2-ISS with novel agents, including anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, and to show that R2-ISS, as a prognostic scoring system, can be applied to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 14(1)
Translational Genomics Research Institute (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Harvard University (US), Ankara University (TR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), University of California, San Francisco (US), Charles University (CZ), Erasmus MC (NL), Sanofi (France) (FR), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), City of Hope (US), Sanofi (United States) (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Sanofi (Japan) (JP), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Hospital Mãe de Deus (BR)
Sanofi
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.