Outcome of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation in Spondylolisthesis

Background: Spondylolisthesis, a prevalent source of low back pain, may require surgery after conservative treatment. Techniques like PLIF, ALIF, and TLIF have distinct benefits; PLIF, notably, provides stabilization and sagittal balance restoration via a single posterior approach. Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation in Spondylolisthesis using cages and bone grafts. The study evaluated the impact of lumbar decompression, interbody fusion, and stabilization on patients' conditions. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January to December 2021, involving 21 patients who underwent the operative procedure. The analysis encompassed the influence of lumbar decompression, interbody fusion using bone graft with cages, and stabilization with pedicle screws and rods on lumbar Spondylolisthesis patients. Results: Out of 21 patients, 7(33.3%) were male and 14(66.7%) were female. The mean age was 46.90±13.7 years and range between 23-70 years. The most expected involved level is L4 over L5 17(81.0%). According to Meyerding's grading, grade II was 15(71.4%), and grade I was 6 (28.6%), according to types of Spondylolistheses lytic 12(57.1%), degenerative 8(38.1%), and dysplastic 1 (4.8%). Excellent outcomes were seen in 17(81.0%) cases and good results were found in 4(19.0%) cases. Probably not fused after surgery was observed in 2(9.5%) patients. The preoperative Oswestry Disability Index was 57.78±2.25, and the postoperative ODI was 16.56±3.53. Conclusion: Instrumented fusion demonstrated higher fusion rates and superior clinical outcomes, suggesting its efficacy in managing lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IAR Journal of Medicine and Surgery Research
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70818/iarjmsr.2024.v05i05.0132
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcome of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation in Spondylolisthesis

Mizanur Rahman
1 citations
IAR Journal of Medicine and Surgery Research
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
0.42
article

Outcome of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation in Spondylolisthesis

Mizanur Rahman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Spondylolisthesis, a prevalent source of low back pain, may require surgery after conservative treatment. Techniques like PLIF, ALIF, and TLIF have distinct benefits; PLIF, notably, provides stabilization and sagittal balance restoration via a single posterior approach. Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation in Spondylolisthesis using cages and bone grafts. The study evaluated the impact of lumbar decompression, interbody fusion, and stabilization on patients' conditions. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January to December 2021, involving 21 patients who underwent the operative procedure. The analysis encompassed the influence of lumbar decompression, interbody fusion using bone graft with cages, and stabilization with pedicle screws and rods on lumbar Spondylolisthesis patients. Results: Out of 21 patients, 7(33.3%) were male and 14(66.7%) were female. The mean age was 46.90±13.7 years and range between 23-70 years. The most expected involved level is L4 over L5 17(81.0%). According to Meyerding's grading, grade II was 15(71.4%), and grade I was 6 (28.6%), according to types of Spondylolistheses lytic 12(57.1%), degenerative 8(38.1%), and dysplastic 1 (4.8%). Excellent outcomes were seen in 17(81.0%) cases and good results were found in 4(19.0%) cases. Probably not fused after surgery was observed in 2(9.5%) patients. The preoperative Oswestry Disability Index was 57.78±2.25, and the postoperative ODI was 16.56±3.53. Conclusion: Instrumented fusion demonstrated higher fusion rates and superior clinical outcomes, suggesting its efficacy in managing lumbar spondylolisthesis.

IAR Journal of Medicine and Surgery ResearchVol. 5(5)
University of Caldas (CO), Trinity Health Michigan (US), University of Medicine Mandalay (MM), K.S. Hegde Hospital (IN), Naftogaz (Ukraine) (UA), University of Rajshahi (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.