Reconstructing the Foundations of Political Philosophy in the Context of New-Quality Productive Forces: Implications for Public Management and Governance Systems

In the context of the rapid development of the digital economy and transformative technologies, new-quality productivity, driven by artificial intelligence, big data, and blockchain, is profoundly reshaping socio-economic structures and governance models. This emerging form of productivity not only redefines resource allocation mechanisms but also challenges the foundational assumptions of traditional political philosophy. Classical frameworks, such as liberalism, utilitarianism, and social contract theory, face significant limitations in addressing complex issues related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and rights distribution, necessitating a theoretical reconstruction to align with the new technological landscape. This study explores the need for reconstructing the philosophical foundations of political systems under new-quality productivity and examines its far-reaching implications for public management and governance frameworks. By analyzing the management models of democratic and centralized systems, the study highlights their respective strengths and weaknesses in managing new-quality productivity. Democratic systems excel in fostering innovation through market-driven mechanisms and societal collaboration but often encounter challenges in coordination and efficiency. In contrast, centralized systems leverage strategic planning and high execution efficiency, yet face potential constraints in innovation and ethical concerns arising from technological centralization. The complementary nature of these systems provides valuable insights into constructing a global governance framework. The study further argues that the global governance system in the digital economy era should emphasize inclusivity and collaboration. By integrating ethical oversight, data sovereignty protection, and multilateral cooperation mechanisms, it is possible to achieve a balance between equity and efficiency in public management. The theoretical contribution of this research lies in advancing interdisciplinary studies between political philosophy and public management, while its practical significance lies in offering policy guidance and solutions to address social inequality, digital divides, and governance challenges in the era of new-quality productivity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Academic journal of management and social sciences
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/d1fqs080
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstructing the Foundations of Political Philosophy in the Context of New-Quality Productive Forces: Implications for Public Management and Governance Systems

Haoxuan Yin, Junbo Chen, Haichu Pan, Yunting Fan
Academic journal of management and social sciences
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Reconstructing the Foundations of Political Philosophy in the Context of New-Quality Productive Forces: Implications for Public Management and Governance Systems

Haoxuan Yin, Junbo Chen, Haichu Pan, Yunting Fan
article en

Abstract

In the context of the rapid development of the digital economy and transformative technologies, new-quality productivity, driven by artificial intelligence, big data, and blockchain, is profoundly reshaping socio-economic structures and governance models. This emerging form of productivity not only redefines resource allocation mechanisms but also challenges the foundational assumptions of traditional political philosophy. Classical frameworks, such as liberalism, utilitarianism, and social contract theory, face significant limitations in addressing complex issues related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and rights distribution, necessitating a theoretical reconstruction to align with the new technological landscape. This study explores the need for reconstructing the philosophical foundations of political systems under new-quality productivity and examines its far-reaching implications for public management and governance frameworks. By analyzing the management models of democratic and centralized systems, the study highlights their respective strengths and weaknesses in managing new-quality productivity. Democratic systems excel in fostering innovation through market-driven mechanisms and societal collaboration but often encounter challenges in coordination and efficiency. In contrast, centralized systems leverage strategic planning and high execution efficiency, yet face potential constraints in innovation and ethical concerns arising from technological centralization. The complementary nature of these systems provides valuable insights into constructing a global governance framework. The study further argues that the global governance system in the digital economy era should emphasize inclusivity and collaboration. By integrating ethical oversight, data sovereignty protection, and multilateral cooperation mechanisms, it is possible to achieve a balance between equity and efficiency in public management. The theoretical contribution of this research lies in advancing interdisciplinary studies between political philosophy and public management, while its practical significance lies in offering policy guidance and solutions to address social inequality, digital divides, and governance challenges in the era of new-quality productivity.

Academic journal of management and social sciencesVol. 9(2)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.