E-cigarette Smoking and Colorectal Cancer Screening

PurposeTo evaluate how CRC screening practices differ between e-cigarette users and non-users.DesignCross-sectional study design.SettingNational Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5).SubjectsRespondents aged 45 to 75 years.MeasuresDemographics, CRC screening, e-cigarette use, cancer history, presence of comorbidities, and access to a primary care provider.AnalysisThe demographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by their e-cigarette smoking status using chi-squared tests. The differences in CRC screening between e-cigarette users and non-users were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.ResultsWe identified a total of 6963 participants, of which 181 (2.6%) were e-cigarette users. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was inversely related to age. A significant portion were uninsured (10.7% vs 5.9% of non-users), and almost half (49.9%) were current tobacco smokers. E-cigarette users were as likely to undergo CRC screening compared to non-users [OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]. Increasing age, educational level, health insurance, comorbidity, access to a primary care provider, personal history of cancer, and presence of a comorbidity were associated with increased participation in CRC screening. However, e-cigarette use was not associated with increased screening.ConclusionOur study found no significant difference in CRC screening rates between e-cigarette users and non-users. While screening behaviors appear unaffected for now, ongoing surveillance is important as more users reach screening age given the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effects of e-cigarette use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241304726
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

E-cigarette Smoking and Colorectal Cancer Screening

Yakubu Bene‐Alhasan, Joseph Atarere, Vwaire Orhurhu, Eugene Annor et al.
3 citations
American Journal of Health Promotion
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
0.85
article

E-cigarette Smoking and Colorectal Cancer Screening

Yakubu Bene‐Alhasan, Joseph Atarere, Vwaire Orhurhu, Eugene Annor, Quarshie Glover, Chinenye Odo, Jamal Hasoon, Wisdom Chinonyelu Ufondu, Nneoma Ubah, Christopher Thompson, Moyasar Osman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate how CRC screening practices differ between e-cigarette users and non-users.DesignCross-sectional study design.SettingNational Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5).SubjectsRespondents aged 45 to 75 years.MeasuresDemographics, CRC screening, e-cigarette use, cancer history, presence of comorbidities, and access to a primary care provider.AnalysisThe demographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by their e-cigarette smoking status using chi-squared tests. The differences in CRC screening between e-cigarette users and non-users were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.ResultsWe identified a total of 6963 participants, of which 181 (2.6%) were e-cigarette users. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was inversely related to age. A significant portion were uninsured (10.7% vs 5.9% of non-users), and almost half (49.9%) were current tobacco smokers. E-cigarette users were as likely to undergo CRC screening compared to non-users [OR 1.40; 95% CI (0.74, 2.66)]. Increasing age, educational level, health insurance, comorbidity, access to a primary care provider, personal history of cancer, and presence of a comorbidity were associated with increased participation in CRC screening. However, e-cigarette use was not associated with increased screening.ConclusionOur study found no significant difference in CRC screening rates between e-cigarette users and non-users. While screening behaviors appear unaffected for now, ongoing surveillance is important as more users reach screening age given the uncertainties surrounding the long-term effects of e-cigarette use.

American Journal of Health PromotionVol. 39(4)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Illinois College (US), Williams (United States) (US), Brown University (US), MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), New York University (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.