Decreased Bi-Partisan Support for Pretrial Detention in Less Serious Cases: Evidence From an Experimental Survey

Despite recent reforms limiting or eliminating cash bail for less serious crimes, we know little about public support for pretrial detention. To help fill this gap, we embedded offense severity experimental manipulations within a national survey administered to 1,368 Americans. While liberals are significantly less likely than conservatives to support pretrial detention in the abstract, these ideological differences largely disappear once offense severity is considered. Support for pretrial detention is significantly lower for misdemeanors versus felonies, non-violent versus violent crimes, and less versus more serious crimes (shoplifting/drug possession vs. robbery/homicide). These offense severity effects hold for respondents across the political spectrum, revealing broad bifurcated support for pretrial detention across more serious versus less serious crimes that align with recent bail reforms targeting less serious crimes. The convergence of decreased support for pretrial detention in less serious cases among conservatives and liberals offers a unique opportunity for bi-partisan bail reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241297690
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decreased Bi-Partisan Support for Pretrial Detention in Less Serious Cases: Evidence From an Experimental Survey

Stacie St. Louis, Nick Petersen
1 citations
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
1.13
article

Decreased Bi-Partisan Support for Pretrial Detention in Less Serious Cases: Evidence From an Experimental Survey

Stacie St. Louis, Nick Petersen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite recent reforms limiting or eliminating cash bail for less serious crimes, we know little about public support for pretrial detention. To help fill this gap, we embedded offense severity experimental manipulations within a national survey administered to 1,368 Americans. While liberals are significantly less likely than conservatives to support pretrial detention in the abstract, these ideological differences largely disappear once offense severity is considered. Support for pretrial detention is significantly lower for misdemeanors versus felonies, non-violent versus violent crimes, and less versus more serious crimes (shoplifting/drug possession vs. robbery/homicide). These offense severity effects hold for respondents across the political spectrum, revealing broad bifurcated support for pretrial detention across more serious versus less serious crimes that align with recent bail reforms targeting less serious crimes. The convergence of decreased support for pretrial detention in less serious cases among conservatives and liberals offers a unique opportunity for bi-partisan bail reform.

Criminal Justice and BehaviorVol. 52(5)
University of Miami (US), American University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.