‘We’ve not breached our side of the contract’: Broken employment bargains and in-work poverty in the financialised hospitality sector

Using the disconnected capitalism thesis, a study of the financialised hospitality sector investigates whether management mitigates the impact of in-work poverty (IWP) for workers. Rather than introduce efforts to alleviate the plight of workers, IWP is exacerbated through policies that encourage insecurity and low pay. Management justifies these actions through forms of misbehaviour, by adopting values reflecting market rationalism that display little regard for the responsibility organisations have to their employees. Adopting a ‘take it or leave it’ approach to work and placing blame on employees themselves for IWP, managers disassociate the organisation and themselves from the plight of employees and begin to identify them as ‘the other’. The study therefore identifies how deeper disconnects between capital and labour emerge within financialised environments, where management fail to offer the fundamental components of an employment bargain that can prevent IWP. Ending IWP, therefore, represents a challenge for policy, practice and attitudinal change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x241297535
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘We’ve not breached our side of the contract’: Broken employment bargains and in-work poverty in the financialised hospitality sector

Ian Cunningham, Victoria Walker
2 citations
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
1.08
article

‘We’ve not breached our side of the contract’: Broken employment bargains and in-work poverty in the financialised hospitality sector

Ian Cunningham, Victoria Walker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Using the disconnected capitalism thesis, a study of the financialised hospitality sector investigates whether management mitigates the impact of in-work poverty (IWP) for workers. Rather than introduce efforts to alleviate the plight of workers, IWP is exacerbated through policies that encourage insecurity and low pay. Management justifies these actions through forms of misbehaviour, by adopting values reflecting market rationalism that display little regard for the responsibility organisations have to their employees. Adopting a ‘take it or leave it’ approach to work and placing blame on employees themselves for IWP, managers disassociate the organisation and themselves from the plight of employees and begin to identify them as ‘the other’. The study therefore identifies how deeper disconnects between capital and labour emerge within financialised environments, where management fail to offer the fundamental components of an employment bargain that can prevent IWP. Ending IWP, therefore, represents a challenge for policy, practice and attitudinal change.

Economic and Industrial DemocracyVol. 47(1)
University of Strathclyde (GB), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
University of Strathclyde
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘We’ve not breached our side of the contract’: Broken employment bargains and in-work poverty in the financialised hospitality sector — Ian Cunningham, Victoria Walker · Economic and Industrial Democracy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS