Solid Waste Management in Port-Harcourt Municipality

The current solid waste management practices in Port-Harcourt municipality was reviewed in association with the waste generators perception and involvement. This research was as a result of the absence of notable improvement in solid waste management over a period of 20 years. Waste generators, being the residents living in Port-Harcourt are often thought to be undisciplined, unsupportive and unresponsive to the government’s and waste agencies’ efforts to achieve optimal solid waste management. Thus, a cross sectional survey was conducted to find out if this was actually so. A total of 1000 questionnaires were distributed randomly at 14 different sample locations in PortHarcourt municipality and 983 were successfully retrieved. Questionnaire validation was conducted through expert’s assessment, pilot test and Cronbach’s Alpha analysis (CA). CA analysis using SPSS for 85% of the questions raised in the pilot study was 0.89, which indicated a good internal consistency in the responses. Results indicated that 43% of the residents were actually satisfied concerning the waste services rendered to them, 62% were actively involved in assisting the government manage solid waste, and 55% of the residents were fully aware of the benefits of good solid waste management in their municipality. This clearly establishes the willingness of the residents in the municipality to work hand-in-hand with the government in curbing the menace of poor solid waste management. The onus therefore lies with the government and waste agencies to gun for inclusivity if a positive deviation from the status quo is desired.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-06100112
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solid Waste Management in Port-Harcourt Municipality

Chikezie Dean Okereke, Eunice D. Macpepple, C. C. Egwuonwu, Cyprian N. Tom
1 citations
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
1.96
article

Solid Waste Management in Port-Harcourt Municipality

Chikezie Dean Okereke, Eunice D. Macpepple, C. C. Egwuonwu, Cyprian N. Tom
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The current solid waste management practices in Port-Harcourt municipality was reviewed in association with the waste generators perception and involvement. This research was as a result of the absence of notable improvement in solid waste management over a period of 20 years. Waste generators, being the residents living in Port-Harcourt are often thought to be undisciplined, unsupportive and unresponsive to the government’s and waste agencies’ efforts to achieve optimal solid waste management. Thus, a cross sectional survey was conducted to find out if this was actually so. A total of 1000 questionnaires were distributed randomly at 14 different sample locations in PortHarcourt municipality and 983 were successfully retrieved. Questionnaire validation was conducted through expert’s assessment, pilot test and Cronbach’s Alpha analysis (CA). CA analysis using SPSS for 85% of the questions raised in the pilot study was 0.89, which indicated a good internal consistency in the responses. Results indicated that 43% of the residents were actually satisfied concerning the waste services rendered to them, 62% were actively involved in assisting the government manage solid waste, and 55% of the residents were fully aware of the benefits of good solid waste management in their municipality. This clearly establishes the willingness of the residents in the municipality to work hand-in-hand with the government in curbing the menace of poor solid waste management. The onus therefore lies with the government and waste agencies to gun for inclusivity if a positive deviation from the status quo is desired.

International Journal of Advances in Engineering and ManagementVol. 6(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.