The Sociology of Tomb and Temple Robbers of the Late 20<sup>th</sup> Dynasty: Part II, The Bands of Thieves and the Ramesside Society

This article is the second part of a study devoted to the sociology of tomb robberies at the end of the 20 th Dynasty and focuses on the organization of the thieves into bands. These structures were relatively stable. Leadership was inconstant and associated with unequal loot sharing and conflict. Households, including enslaved people, played an important role in band organization particularly among tomb robbers, while hierarchy and patronage with corruption and blackmailing characterized temple thefts. Another social pattern relying on equality, solidarity, and merit existed among tomb robbers of an equal social status and probably corresponds to what ancient Egyptians called wnḏw. How these patterns of sociability are representative of the society of the time is discussed. [Formula: see text]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03075133241299449
Primary Topic
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sociology of Tomb and Temple Robbers of the Late 20th Dynasty: Part II, The Bands of Thieves and the Ramesside Society

Jean‐Christophe Antoine
The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
article

The Sociology of Tomb and Temple Robbers of the Late 20th Dynasty: Part II, The Bands of Thieves and the Ramesside Society

Jean‐Christophe Antoine
article en

Abstract

This article is the second part of a study devoted to the sociology of tomb robberies at the end of the 20 th Dynasty and focuses on the organization of the thieves into bands. These structures were relatively stable. Leadership was inconstant and associated with unequal loot sharing and conflict. Households, including enslaved people, played an important role in band organization particularly among tomb robbers, while hierarchy and patronage with corruption and blackmailing characterized temple thefts. Another social pattern relying on equality, solidarity, and merit existed among tomb robbers of an equal social status and probably corresponds to what ancient Egyptians called wnḏw. How these patterns of sociability are representative of the society of the time is discussed. [Formula: see text]

The Journal of Egyptian ArchaeologyVol. 110(1-2)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.