Hardt and Negri’s political ontology: The scope of the multitude and the reality of the revolutionary

Hardt and Negri?s philosophical approach is deeply shaped by their interpretation of biopolitics, particularly through their exploration of the multitude?s power and their analysis of emerging forms of sovereignty. The revolutionary potential within the diversity of the multitude cannot be fully grasped without considering the broader context of their critique of neoliberal political practices and their view of the Empire as a system that creates mechanisms for new political thought and action. A central question posed is whether, in reinterpreting Marxism through a postmodern lens, these authors manage to provide a framework for new, small-scale revolutions, or whether their intense focus on sovereignty has left them disconnected from the very multiplicity that defines the multitude?s potential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Filozofija i drustvo
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/fid240926008d
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hardt and Negri’s political ontology: The scope of the multitude and the reality of the revolutionary

Sara Dragišić
Filozofija i drustvo
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Hardt and Negri’s political ontology: The scope of the multitude and the reality of the revolutionary

Sara Dragišić
article en

Abstract

Hardt and Negri?s philosophical approach is deeply shaped by their interpretation of biopolitics, particularly through their exploration of the multitude?s power and their analysis of emerging forms of sovereignty. The revolutionary potential within the diversity of the multitude cannot be fully grasped without considering the broader context of their critique of neoliberal political practices and their view of the Empire as a system that creates mechanisms for new political thought and action. A central question posed is whether, in reinterpreting Marxism through a postmodern lens, these authors manage to provide a framework for new, small-scale revolutions, or whether their intense focus on sovereignty has left them disconnected from the very multiplicity that defines the multitude?s potential.

Filozofija i drustvoVol. 36(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.