Ligand Many-Body Expansion as a General Approach for Accelerating Transition Metal Complex Discovery

Methods that accelerate the evaluation of molecular properties are essential for chemical discovery. While some degree of ligand additivity has been established for transition metal complexes, it is underutilized in asymmetric complexes, such as the square pyramidal coordination geometries highly relevant to catalysis. To develop predictive methods beyond simple additivity, we apply a many-body expansion to octahedral and square pyramidal complexes and introduce a correction based on adjacent ligands (i.e., the <i>cis</i> interaction model). We first test the <i>cis</i> interaction model on adiabatic spin-splitting energies of octahedral Fe(II) complexes, predicting DFT-calculated values of unseen binary complexes to within an average error of 1.4 kcal/mol. Uncertainty analysis reveals the optimal basis, comprising the homoleptic and <i>mer</i> symmetric complexes. We next show that the <i>cis</i> model (i.e., the <i>cis</i> interaction model solved for the optimal basis) infers both DFT- and CCSD(T)-calculated model catalytic reaction energies to within 1 kcal/mol on average. The <i>cis</i> model predicts low-symmetry complexes with reaction energies outside the range of binary complex reaction energies. We observe that <i>trans</i> interactions are unnecessary for most monodentate systems but can be important for some combinations of ligands, such as complexes containing a mixture of bidentate and monodentate ligands. Finally, we demonstrate that the <i>cis</i> model may be combined with Δ-learning to predict CCSD(T) reaction energies from exhaustively calculated DFT reaction energies and the same fraction of CCSD(T) reaction energies needed for the <i>cis</i> model, achieving around 30% of the error from using the CCSD(T) reaction energies in the <i>cis</i> model alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01728
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ligand Many-Body Expansion as a General Approach for Accelerating Transition Metal Complex Discovery

Daniel B. K. Chu, Ralf Meyer, Aditya Nandy, Heather Janine Kulik et al.
3 citations
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.35
article

Ligand Many-Body Expansion as a General Approach for Accelerating Transition Metal Complex Discovery

Daniel B. K. Chu, Ralf Meyer, Aditya Nandy, Heather Janine Kulik, David Alfredo Gonzalez-Narvaez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Methods that accelerate the evaluation of molecular properties are essential for chemical discovery. While some degree of ligand additivity has been established for transition metal complexes, it is underutilized in asymmetric complexes, such as the square pyramidal coordination geometries highly relevant to catalysis. To develop predictive methods beyond simple additivity, we apply a many-body expansion to octahedral and square pyramidal complexes and introduce a correction based on adjacent ligands (i.e., the <i>cis</i> interaction model). We first test the <i>cis</i> interaction model on adiabatic spin-splitting energies of octahedral Fe(II) complexes, predicting DFT-calculated values of unseen binary complexes to within an average error of 1.4 kcal/mol. Uncertainty analysis reveals the optimal basis, comprising the homoleptic and <i>mer</i> symmetric complexes. We next show that the <i>cis</i> model (i.e., the <i>cis</i> interaction model solved for the optimal basis) infers both DFT- and CCSD(T)-calculated model catalytic reaction energies to within 1 kcal/mol on average. The <i>cis</i> model predicts low-symmetry complexes with reaction energies outside the range of binary complex reaction energies. We observe that <i>trans</i> interactions are unnecessary for most monodentate systems but can be important for some combinations of ligands, such as complexes containing a mixture of bidentate and monodentate ligands. Finally, we demonstrate that the <i>cis</i> model may be combined with Δ-learning to predict CCSD(T) reaction energies from exhaustively calculated DFT reaction energies and the same fraction of CCSD(T) reaction energies needed for the <i>cis</i> model, achieving around 30% of the error from using the CCSD(T) reaction energies in the <i>cis</i> model alone.

Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingVol. 64(24)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, Basic Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.