Transfer Learning for the Prediction of Energy Performance of Water-Cooled Electric Chillers: Grey-Box Models Versus Deep Neural Network (DNN) Models

The development of data-driven prediction models of energy performance of HVAC equipment, such as chillers, depends on the quality and quantity of measurement data for the model training. The practical applications always struggle with the credibility of results when the training dataset of an existing chiller is relatively small. Moreover, when the energy analyst needs to develop a reliable predictive model of a new chiller, the manufacturer’s proprietary data are not always available. The transfer learning method can soften these constraints and can help in the development of a predictive model that captures the knowledge from the available chiller, called the source chiller, using a small dataset, and apply it to a new chiller, called the target chiller. The paper presents the successful application of transfer learning strategies by using grey-box models and DNN models for the prediction of chillers performance, when measurement data are recorded at 15 min time intervals by the building automation system (BAS) and used for training and testing. The paper confirms the initial hypothesis that both the grey-box models and DNN models of the source chiller from July 2013 predict well the energy performance of the target chiller with measurement datasets from 2016. The DNN models perform slightly better than the grey-box models. The pre-trained grey-box models and DNN models, respectively, are transferred to the target chiller using three strategies: SelfL, TLS0, and TLS1, and the results are compared. SelfL strategy trains and tests the models only with the target data. TLS0 strategy directly transfers the models from the source chiller to the target chiller. TLS1 strategy transfers the models, pre-trained with an extended dataset that is composed of training dataset of Ds and training dataset of Dt. Finally, the models are tested with another set of testing data. The difference in computation times of these two types of models is not significant for preventing the use of DNN models for the applications within the BAS, when compared with grey-box models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235981
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transfer Learning for the Prediction of Energy Performance of Water-Cooled Electric Chillers: Grey-Box Models Versus Deep Neural Network (DNN) Models

Hongwen Dou, Radu Zmeureanu
4 citations
Energies
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.06
article

Transfer Learning for the Prediction of Energy Performance of Water-Cooled Electric Chillers: Grey-Box Models Versus Deep Neural Network (DNN) Models

Hongwen Dou, Radu Zmeureanu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The development of data-driven prediction models of energy performance of HVAC equipment, such as chillers, depends on the quality and quantity of measurement data for the model training. The practical applications always struggle with the credibility of results when the training dataset of an existing chiller is relatively small. Moreover, when the energy analyst needs to develop a reliable predictive model of a new chiller, the manufacturer’s proprietary data are not always available. The transfer learning method can soften these constraints and can help in the development of a predictive model that captures the knowledge from the available chiller, called the source chiller, using a small dataset, and apply it to a new chiller, called the target chiller. The paper presents the successful application of transfer learning strategies by using grey-box models and DNN models for the prediction of chillers performance, when measurement data are recorded at 15 min time intervals by the building automation system (BAS) and used for training and testing. The paper confirms the initial hypothesis that both the grey-box models and DNN models of the source chiller from July 2013 predict well the energy performance of the target chiller with measurement datasets from 2016. The DNN models perform slightly better than the grey-box models. The pre-trained grey-box models and DNN models, respectively, are transferred to the target chiller using three strategies: SelfL, TLS0, and TLS1, and the results are compared. SelfL strategy trains and tests the models only with the target data. TLS0 strategy directly transfers the models from the source chiller to the target chiller. TLS1 strategy transfers the models, pre-trained with an extended dataset that is composed of training dataset of Ds and training dataset of Dt. Finally, the models are tested with another set of testing data. The difference in computation times of these two types of models is not significant for preventing the use of DNN models for the applications within the BAS, when compared with grey-box models.

EnergiesVol. 17(23)
Concordia University, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transfer Learning for the Prediction of Energy Performance of Water-Cooled Electric Chillers: Grey-Box Models Versus Deep Neural Network (DNN) Models — Hongwen Dou, Radu Zmeureanu · Energies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS