Measurement of Tip Load With a Pacemaker Lead Stylet and Guiding Catheter Using a Silicone Heart Model

Background Ventricular septal pacing has long been performed using a stylet during pacemaker implantation, but with the availability of guiding catheters, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing have also been performed. However, it is not known to what extent the tip load of the ventricular lead differs when a guiding catheter is used compared with a stylet alone. In this study, the tip load was measured for different stylet stiffness and guiding catheter geometries at sites where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed. Method A small weighing instrument was placed in the right ventricular septal portion of the silicone heart model to measure the apical load of the ventricular lead when using two types of guiding catheters and three different types of stylets according to stiffness at the site where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed. Results The guiding catheter group had by far the highest tip load compared to the stylet group (Site Selective Pacing Catheter (SSPC) multipurpose group 17.9 ± 1.6 g, SSPC extended hook group 3.6 ± 0.8 g). There was no significant difference in tip load between His bundle pacing site and the left bundle branch area pacing site for the normally used stiffness stylet. Conclusions Guiding catheters are used for conduction system pacing but must be used with great care as they apply a much greater tip load than conventional lead placement with a stylet alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74655
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement of Tip Load With a Pacemaker Lead Stylet and Guiding Catheter Using a Silicone Heart Model

Daisuke Yamazaki
2 citations
Cureus
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.80
article

Measurement of Tip Load With a Pacemaker Lead Stylet and Guiding Catheter Using a Silicone Heart Model

Daisuke Yamazaki
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background Ventricular septal pacing has long been performed using a stylet during pacemaker implantation, but with the availability of guiding catheters, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing have also been performed. However, it is not known to what extent the tip load of the ventricular lead differs when a guiding catheter is used compared with a stylet alone. In this study, the tip load was measured for different stylet stiffness and guiding catheter geometries at sites where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed. Method A small weighing instrument was placed in the right ventricular septal portion of the silicone heart model to measure the apical load of the ventricular lead when using two types of guiding catheters and three different types of stylets according to stiffness at the site where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed. Results The guiding catheter group had by far the highest tip load compared to the stylet group (Site Selective Pacing Catheter (SSPC) multipurpose group 17.9 ± 1.6 g, SSPC extended hook group 3.6 ± 0.8 g). There was no significant difference in tip load between His bundle pacing site and the left bundle branch area pacing site for the normally used stiffness stylet. Conclusions Guiding catheters are used for conduction system pacing but must be used with great care as they apply a much greater tip load than conventional lead placement with a stylet alone.

CureusVol. 16(11)
Akita University (JP)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.