Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Energy Transition Policy Since the 14th Five-Year Plan, Based on the MLP-PMC Model

Evaluating the effectiveness of China’s energy transition policies and formulating scientific policy optimization paths are essential for advancing China’s energy transition and global carbon reduction. This paper quantitatively evaluates China’s 22 key energy transition policies during the 14th Five-Year Plan period via text excavation, the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP), and the PMC index model. The research results show that the overall design of China’s energy transition policy is reasonable. Only two policies are graded as acceptable, while the rest of the policies are graded as good or higher. In addition, landscape policy, regime policy, and niche policy have a decreasing influence on energy transition projects in China. This research summarizes three common shortcomings in China’s energy transition policy: (1) the lack of explicit policy incentives and constraints; (2) the inadequate authority of policy releasers; and (3) the limited coverage of the policy focus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235990
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Energy Transition Policy Since the 14th Five-Year Plan, Based on the MLP-PMC Model

Pibin Guo, Tong Zou, Yongkyu Chang
3 citations
Energies
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.39
article

Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Energy Transition Policy Since the 14th Five-Year Plan, Based on the MLP-PMC Model

Pibin Guo, Tong Zou, Yongkyu Chang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Evaluating the effectiveness of China’s energy transition policies and formulating scientific policy optimization paths are essential for advancing China’s energy transition and global carbon reduction. This paper quantitatively evaluates China’s 22 key energy transition policies during the 14th Five-Year Plan period via text excavation, the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP), and the PMC index model. The research results show that the overall design of China’s energy transition policy is reasonable. Only two policies are graded as acceptable, while the rest of the policies are graded as good or higher. In addition, landscape policy, regime policy, and niche policy have a decreasing influence on energy transition projects in China. This research summarizes three common shortcomings in China’s energy transition policy: (1) the lack of explicit policy incentives and constraints; (2) the inadequate authority of policy releasers; and (3) the limited coverage of the policy focus.

EnergiesVol. 17(23)
Australian National University (AU), North University of China (CN), Shanxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Energy Transition Policy Since the 14th Five-Year Plan, Based on the MLP-PMC Model — Pibin Guo, Tong Zou, et al. · Energies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS