K některým problémům spojeným s pokračováním v trestném činu, trvajícími a hromadnými trestnými činy

The journal article discusses the problems associated with crimes committed over a longer period of time, in particular in the context of the Supreme Court’s decision of 23 September 2020, file number 8 Tdo 866/2020, which dealt with whether the offence of stalking under section 354 of the Criminal Code was a continuation of an offence or an ongoing one. When discussing this decision in the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court, a debate was held as to whether it was correctly an ongoing or cumulative offence. The article deals with the arguments that have been made in this regard and concludes that it is an ongoing offence. In that context, it also addresses the issue of the so-called coherent actions, and on the basis of analysis of Supreme Court jurisprudence, that these are not another category of crimes characterised by a longer period of committing, but are merely an adjunct in theory and practice of differentiated categories continuation of offence, ongoing offence, and cumulative offence which serves only to refine and distinguish them correctly in specific cases under assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.161
Primary Topic
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

K některým problémům spojeným s pokračováním v trestném činu, trvajícími a hromadnými trestnými činy

Pavel Šámal
AUC IURIDICA
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
article

K některým problémům spojeným s pokračováním v trestném činu, trvajícími a hromadnými trestnými činy

Pavel Šámal
article en

Abstract

The journal article discusses the problems associated with crimes committed over a longer period of time, in particular in the context of the Supreme Court’s decision of 23 September 2020, file number 8 Tdo 866/2020, which dealt with whether the offence of stalking under section 354 of the Criminal Code was a continuation of an offence or an ongoing one. When discussing this decision in the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court, a debate was held as to whether it was correctly an ongoing or cumulative offence. The article deals with the arguments that have been made in this regard and concludes that it is an ongoing offence. In that context, it also addresses the issue of the so-called coherent actions, and on the basis of analysis of Supreme Court jurisprudence, that these are not another category of crimes characterised by a longer period of committing, but are merely an adjunct in theory and practice of differentiated categories continuation of offence, ongoing offence, and cumulative offence which serves only to refine and distinguish them correctly in specific cases under assessment.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 70(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

K některým problémům spojeným s pokračováním v trestném činu, trvajícími a hromadnými trestnými činy — Pavel Šámal · AUC IURIDICA (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS