The Essence of Green Participatory Budgeting

This paper presents a pioneering bibliometric analysis of the literature surrounding green participatory budgeting (GPB), examining research trends from 2002 to October 2024. Utilizing various keyword combinations, a total of 90 relevant articles were extracted from the Web of Science database. The analysis reveals a significant rise in publications beginning in 2017, with peak activity in 2019, indicating growing interest from researchers and policymakers. Key thematic categories identified include Environmental Studies, Urban Studies, and Public Administration, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the field. Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlights terms such as ‘participatory budgeting,’ ‘democracy,’ and ‘governance,’ while co-authorship analysis uncovers collaboration networks among researchers across countries. The findings underline the integration of sustainability into participatory budgeting processes and provide a foundation for future research in this important area of public finance. The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive approach to exploring the complexities of GPB and its practical implications for enhancing public engagement and policy development toward sustainable budgeting practices. The objective of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the literature on green participatory budgeting and identify research trends, key themes, and co-authorship networks in the field. Data were extracted from the Web of Science database using various keyword combinations related to GPB. A total of 90 articles published between 2002 and October 2024 were analyzed. The annual publication frequency was recorded, and the data were further analyzed using VOS viewer software to perform keyword co-occurrence and co-authorship analyses. The analysis reveals a notable increase in publications starting in 2017, peaking in 2019. The leading categories identified include Environmental Studies (23 publications), Urban Studies (16), and Public Administration (15). Keyword co-occurrence analysis indicated that the most frequently occurring terms are ‘participatory budgeting,’ ‘democracy,’ and ‘governance.’ Co-authorship analysis revealed three clusters of collaboration, including countries such as England, Finland, the USA, and China. The comprehensive analysis of trends and publication frequency provides policymakers with a clearer understanding of the evolving narrative surrounding green participatory budgeting. This insight can drive evidence-based decision-making, allowing them to allocate resources effectively toward sustainable projects that engage citizens. This paper is pioneering in its systematic bibliometric analysis of green participatory budgeting (GPB) and related topics within academic literature. By synthesizing diverse research outputs over more than two decades, it establishes a foundational understanding of the field, which has previously been overlooked.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v15.4(76).01
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Essence of Green Participatory Budgeting

Małgorzata Siemionek, Małgorzata SIEMIONEK-RUSKAŃ
2 citations
Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
1.42
article

The Essence of Green Participatory Budgeting

Małgorzata Siemionek, Małgorzata SIEMIONEK-RUSKAŃ
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a pioneering bibliometric analysis of the literature surrounding green participatory budgeting (GPB), examining research trends from 2002 to October 2024. Utilizing various keyword combinations, a total of 90 relevant articles were extracted from the Web of Science database. The analysis reveals a significant rise in publications beginning in 2017, with peak activity in 2019, indicating growing interest from researchers and policymakers. Key thematic categories identified include Environmental Studies, Urban Studies, and Public Administration, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the field. Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlights terms such as ‘participatory budgeting,’ ‘democracy,’ and ‘governance,’ while co-authorship analysis uncovers collaboration networks among researchers across countries. The findings underline the integration of sustainability into participatory budgeting processes and provide a foundation for future research in this important area of public finance. The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive approach to exploring the complexities of GPB and its practical implications for enhancing public engagement and policy development toward sustainable budgeting practices. The objective of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the literature on green participatory budgeting and identify research trends, key themes, and co-authorship networks in the field. Data were extracted from the Web of Science database using various keyword combinations related to GPB. A total of 90 articles published between 2002 and October 2024 were analyzed. The annual publication frequency was recorded, and the data were further analyzed using VOS viewer software to perform keyword co-occurrence and co-authorship analyses. The analysis reveals a notable increase in publications starting in 2017, peaking in 2019. The leading categories identified include Environmental Studies (23 publications), Urban Studies (16), and Public Administration (15). Keyword co-occurrence analysis indicated that the most frequently occurring terms are ‘participatory budgeting,’ ‘democracy,’ and ‘governance.’ Co-authorship analysis revealed three clusters of collaboration, including countries such as England, Finland, the USA, and China. The comprehensive analysis of trends and publication frequency provides policymakers with a clearer understanding of the evolving narrative surrounding green participatory budgeting. This insight can drive evidence-based decision-making, allowing them to allocate resources effectively toward sustainable projects that engage citizens. This paper is pioneering in its systematic bibliometric analysis of green participatory budgeting (GPB) and related topics within academic literature. By synthesizing diverse research outputs over more than two decades, it establishes a foundational understanding of the field, which has previously been overlooked.

Journal of Environmental Management and TourismVol. 15(4)
University of Gdańsk (PL), WSB Merito University in Gdańsk (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.