A unit-level one-inflated beta model for small area prediction of seat-belt use rates

We develop a unit-level one-inflated beta model for the purpose of small area estimation. Our specific interest is in estimation of seat-belt use rates for Iowa counties using data from the Iowa Seat-Belt Use Survey. As a result of small county sample sizes, small area estimation methods are needed. We propose frequentist and Bayesian implementations of a unit-level one-inflated beta model. We compare the Bayesian and frequentist predictors to simpler alternatives through simulation. We apply the proposed Bayesian and frequentist procedures to data from the Iowa Seat-Belt Use Survey.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Statistics
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2024.2426016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A unit-level one-inflated beta model for small area prediction of seat-belt use rates

Emily Berg, Zirou Zhou
1 citations
Journal of Applied Statistics
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
0.71
article

A unit-level one-inflated beta model for small area prediction of seat-belt use rates

Emily Berg, Zirou Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We develop a unit-level one-inflated beta model for the purpose of small area estimation. Our specific interest is in estimation of seat-belt use rates for Iowa counties using data from the Iowa Seat-Belt Use Survey. As a result of small county sample sizes, small area estimation methods are needed. We propose frequentist and Bayesian implementations of a unit-level one-inflated beta model. We compare the Bayesian and frequentist predictors to simpler alternatives through simulation. We apply the proposed Bayesian and frequentist procedures to data from the Iowa Seat-Belt Use Survey.

Journal of Applied StatisticsVol. 52(7)
Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.