Survival Outcomes for Men over 80 Years Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Analysis

<b>Introduction:</b> Prostate cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among elderly males in Western countries. TRUS biopsy remains a standard diagnosing approach for prostate cancer but poses notable risks, particularly in older men, including complications such as sepsis, acute retention, and rectal bleeding, which can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate cancer-specific survival outcomes in men aged over 80 years and whether there is any cancer-specific survival advantage for TRUS biopsy procedure. <b>Methods</b>: Between January 2005 and December 2015, we studied outcomes of 200 patients (median age, 82 years) with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4.0 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) who underwent TRUS biopsy. Each participant was followed up until death using an electronic system and a unique identifier in a defined geographical area. Cancer-specific and overall survival analyses were carried out utilising SPSS, while R Project was employed to construct and evaluate two nomograms survival duration and predict the risk of death post-biopsy. All statistical tests were two-tailed, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: Amongst the participants, only 24 patients were alive at the end of follow-up (median age, 91 years). The PSA levels ranged from 4.88 to 102.7 ng/mL. Log-rank and Breslow tests indicated that higher PSA levels, the development of metastases, and ISUP grade group 8-10 were associated with shorter survival times. Age, co-morbid conditions, and tumour type were incorporated into the nomogram due to their clinical significance. Patients aged <81 years had lower mortality risk, while those aged >88 years faced higher mortality risks. Complications from the biopsy increased mortality risks in both cancerous and benign cases, and metastasis significantly heightened the likelihood of death. However, co-morbid conditions did not influence survival probability. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings underscore that older age (specifically 80 years and above), high Gleason score, metastasis, and elevated PSA levels are predictive of poorer survival outcomes in elderly men following TRUS biopsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16233995
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival Outcomes for Men over 80 Years Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Analysis

D.A. Alghamdi, Chunhui Li, Ghulam Nabi, Neil Kernohan
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Survival Outcomes for Men over 80 Years Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Analysis

D.A. Alghamdi, Chunhui Li, Ghulam Nabi, Neil Kernohan
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Prostate cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among elderly males in Western countries. TRUS biopsy remains a standard diagnosing approach for prostate cancer but poses notable risks, particularly in older men, including complications such as sepsis, acute retention, and rectal bleeding, which can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate cancer-specific survival outcomes in men aged over 80 years and whether there is any cancer-specific survival advantage for TRUS biopsy procedure. <b>Methods</b>: Between January 2005 and December 2015, we studied outcomes of 200 patients (median age, 82 years) with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4.0 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) who underwent TRUS biopsy. Each participant was followed up until death using an electronic system and a unique identifier in a defined geographical area. Cancer-specific and overall survival analyses were carried out utilising SPSS, while R Project was employed to construct and evaluate two nomograms survival duration and predict the risk of death post-biopsy. All statistical tests were two-tailed, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: Amongst the participants, only 24 patients were alive at the end of follow-up (median age, 91 years). The PSA levels ranged from 4.88 to 102.7 ng/mL. Log-rank and Breslow tests indicated that higher PSA levels, the development of metastases, and ISUP grade group 8-10 were associated with shorter survival times. Age, co-morbid conditions, and tumour type were incorporated into the nomogram due to their clinical significance. Patients aged <81 years had lower mortality risk, while those aged >88 years faced higher mortality risks. Complications from the biopsy increased mortality risks in both cancerous and benign cases, and metastasis significantly heightened the likelihood of death. However, co-morbid conditions did not influence survival probability. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings underscore that older age (specifically 80 years and above), high Gleason score, metastasis, and elevated PSA levels are predictive of poorer survival outcomes in elderly men following TRUS biopsy.

CancersVol. 16(23)
University of Dundee (GB), Ninewells Hospital (GB), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.