Intensity Matters Inside and Outside Primary School: Evidence from High‐<scp>CLIL</scp>, Low‐<scp>CLIL,</scp> and Non‐<scp>CLIL</scp> Learners

Abstract Research involving secondary school EFL learners has demonstrated that greater intensity of exposure, via CLIL lessons, yields notable benefits. However, studies in primary school are scarce and less optimistic. Furthermore, little is known about the effects of different degrees of CLIL intensity and of learners' exposure to Extramural English (EE) through formal or informal out‐of‐school activities. To address these gaps, this study examines the impact of CLIL and EE on the proficiency of 180 primary school learners of English (aged 10–11 years) divided into a high‐CLIL ( N = 78), a low‐CLIL ( N = 56), and a non‐CLIL ( N = 46) group. Results showed some advantages among high‐CLIL learners, including higher scores and less intragroup variability, while no significant differences were observed between low‐CLIL and non‐CLIL learners. EE activities were common, with several weak but positive correlations found between EE and proficiency, particularly involving watching TV and reading, and mainly affecting non‐CLIL learners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TESOL Quarterly
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3369
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intensity Matters Inside and Outside Primary School: Evidence from High‐CLIL, Low‐CLIL, and Non‐CLIL Learners

Amparo Lázaro Ibarrola
3 citations
TESOL Quarterly
Second Language Learning and Teaching
11.73
article

Intensity Matters Inside and Outside Primary School: Evidence from High‐CLIL, Low‐CLIL, and Non‐CLIL Learners

Amparo Lázaro Ibarrola
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Research involving secondary school EFL learners has demonstrated that greater intensity of exposure, via CLIL lessons, yields notable benefits. However, studies in primary school are scarce and less optimistic. Furthermore, little is known about the effects of different degrees of CLIL intensity and of learners' exposure to Extramural English (EE) through formal or informal out‐of‐school activities. To address these gaps, this study examines the impact of CLIL and EE on the proficiency of 180 primary school learners of English (aged 10–11 years) divided into a high‐CLIL ( N = 78), a low‐CLIL ( N = 56), and a non‐CLIL ( N = 46) group. Results showed some advantages among high‐CLIL learners, including higher scores and less intragroup variability, while no significant differences were observed between low‐CLIL and non‐CLIL learners. EE activities were common, with several weak but positive correlations found between EE and proficiency, particularly involving watching TV and reading, and mainly affecting non‐CLIL learners.

TESOL QuarterlyVol. 59(3)
Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.