Patentability of Algorithmic Processes in India: The Battle Between Blackberry and The Controller of Patents

On 30th August 2024, the Delhi High Court (DHC) delivered two landmark decisions that have drawn attention to the treatment of software-based inventions in Indian patent law. The center of these ruling was the appeals filed by the Blackberry Limited against the rejection of their two patent applications. The first application, titled “Administration of Wireless System”, was rejected on the ground that the claims pertained to a set of instructions and software without inventive hardware feature. While, the second application, titled “Auto-Selection of Media Files”, was rejected for being related to algorithms and computer program per se. This paper aims to examine the court’s reasoning in both cases to assess the consistency of the decisions. By examining these decisions, the paper look into the Indian jurisprudence in dealing with the patent claims for software and algorithms, thereby throw light on the evolving patentability standards in India for AI and software-driven innovations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in intellectual property research.
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.2.1.2024.22
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patentability of Algorithmic Processes in India: The Battle Between Blackberry and The Controller of Patents

M S Sreelakshmi
Trends in intellectual property research.
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Patentability of Algorithmic Processes in India: The Battle Between Blackberry and The Controller of Patents

M S Sreelakshmi
article en

Abstract

On 30th August 2024, the Delhi High Court (DHC) delivered two landmark decisions that have drawn attention to the treatment of software-based inventions in Indian patent law. The center of these ruling was the appeals filed by the Blackberry Limited against the rejection of their two patent applications. The first application, titled “Administration of Wireless System”, was rejected on the ground that the claims pertained to a set of instructions and software without inventive hardware feature. While, the second application, titled “Auto-Selection of Media Files”, was rejected for being related to algorithms and computer program per se. This paper aims to examine the court’s reasoning in both cases to assess the consistency of the decisions. By examining these decisions, the paper look into the Indian jurisprudence in dealing with the patent claims for software and algorithms, thereby throw light on the evolving patentability standards in India for AI and software-driven innovations.

Trends in intellectual property research.Vol. 2(1)
Cochin University of Science and Technology (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patentability of Algorithmic Processes in India: The Battle Between Blackberry and The Controller of Patents — M S Sreelakshmi · Trends in intellectual property research. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS