Practice-based research in the Social Sciences & Humanities: A bibliometric analysis

Practice-based research (PBR) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional models of academia–practice collaborations, aiming to integrate scientific inquiry with practical interventions. However, the lack of a comprehensive, cross-disciplinary understanding of PBR has obstructed its recognition and led to inadequate evaluation frameworks. To address this gap, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis across the Social Sciences and Humanities disciplines to explore trends in PBR adoption and publication. Analyzing 3,417 documents from the Web of Science, it examined PBR research trends and utilized bibliometric mapping to identify thematic research clusters and historical evolution patterns. The findings revealed a growing interest in PBR, likely influenced by a focus on societal impact and educational reforms, such as the integration of vocational education into academic structures. It emphasized the need for cross-disciplinary exploration of PBR, shedding light on its diverse approaches and providing a systematic, data-driven perspective beyond theoretical frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.134
Citations
3
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice-based research in the Social Sciences & Humanities: A bibliometric analysis

Kamila Lewandowska
3 citations
Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.38
article

Practice-based research in the Social Sciences & Humanities: A bibliometric analysis

Kamila Lewandowska
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Practice-based research (PBR) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional models of academia–practice collaborations, aiming to integrate scientific inquiry with practical interventions. However, the lack of a comprehensive, cross-disciplinary understanding of PBR has obstructed its recognition and led to inadequate evaluation frameworks. To address this gap, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis across the Social Sciences and Humanities disciplines to explore trends in PBR adoption and publication. Analyzing 3,417 documents from the Web of Science, it examined PBR research trends and utilized bibliometric mapping to identify thematic research clusters and historical evolution patterns. The findings revealed a growing interest in PBR, likely influenced by a focus on societal impact and educational reforms, such as the integration of vocational education into academic structures. It emphasized the need for cross-disciplinary exploration of PBR, shedding light on its diverse approaches and providing a systematic, data-driven perspective beyond theoretical frameworks.

Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and CommunicationVol. 4(3)
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.