Force-Velocity Profiles in Collegiate American Football Players

The application of force-velocity (FV) profiling in American football has yet to be explored. Purpose: To measure and compare FV profiles in collegiate American football players grouped by position, and to determine if FV profiles could predict countermovement jump (CMJ) height and sprinting performance. Methods: Horizontal and vertical FV profiles, CMJ and sprinting performance were assessed in 81 collegiate American football players. One-way ANOVAs were used to determine if significant differences in FV profiles existed between position groups (big: offensive/defensive lineman, big skill: linebacker, skill: quarterback). Correlation analyses were used to determine if performance measures (CMJ, sprints) were related to FV profiles (maximum force, F0, maximum velocity, V0, maximum power, Pmax). We hypothesized that 1) “big” athletes would have the highest F0, and 2) horizontal and vertical FV profiling metrics would correlate with sprinting performance and CMJ height, respectively. Results: “Big” athletes had the highest absolute F0 in the horizontal FV profiles but when normalized to body weight, they had the lowest F0 and 77% were classified as force-deficient. When accounting for body weight, vertical FV metrics explained 62.8% of the variance in CMJ height and horizontal FV metrics accounted for 85.0% of the variance in sprinting performance. Conclusion: Athletes’ FV imbalance could not be predicted by their position. Vertical- and horizontal-related FV variables predicted performance metrics that were performed in the same plane, suggesting that FV profiling could be a useful performance assessment tool in American football.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v4i1.363
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Force-Velocity Profiles in Collegiate American Football Players

Trevor Short, Paulette M. Yamada, K R Cooke, Parker Hill et al.
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

Force-Velocity Profiles in Collegiate American Football Players

Trevor Short, Paulette M. Yamada, K R Cooke, Parker Hill, Ryan Ishihara, Josh Elms, Trevor Sackmann
article en

Abstract

The application of force-velocity (FV) profiling in American football has yet to be explored. Purpose: To measure and compare FV profiles in collegiate American football players grouped by position, and to determine if FV profiles could predict countermovement jump (CMJ) height and sprinting performance. Methods: Horizontal and vertical FV profiles, CMJ and sprinting performance were assessed in 81 collegiate American football players. One-way ANOVAs were used to determine if significant differences in FV profiles existed between position groups (big: offensive/defensive lineman, big skill: linebacker, skill: quarterback). Correlation analyses were used to determine if performance measures (CMJ, sprints) were related to FV profiles (maximum force, F0, maximum velocity, V0, maximum power, Pmax). We hypothesized that 1) “big” athletes would have the highest F0, and 2) horizontal and vertical FV profiling metrics would correlate with sprinting performance and CMJ height, respectively. Results: “Big” athletes had the highest absolute F0 in the horizontal FV profiles but when normalized to body weight, they had the lowest F0 and 77% were classified as force-deficient. When accounting for body weight, vertical FV metrics explained 62.8% of the variance in CMJ height and horizontal FV metrics accounted for 85.0% of the variance in sprinting performance. Conclusion: Athletes’ FV imbalance could not be predicted by their position. Vertical- and horizontal-related FV variables predicted performance metrics that were performed in the same plane, suggesting that FV profiling could be a useful performance assessment tool in American football.

International Journal of Strength and ConditioningVol. 4(1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.