Development of the dementia attitude scale focusing on well-being

Introduction This study aimed to develop the Dementia Attitude Scale Focusing on well-being (DASFWB) and to verify its reliability and validity. This scale measures the factors that individuals without dementia would consider important for their well-being if they were to develop dementia. It is expected to serve as a useful indicator for intervention strategies aimed at achieving an inclusive society. Methods The draft DASFWB scale was developed by extracting stories from older adults with mild Alzheimer's disease. The questionnaire was distributed to 1,614 adults aged 65 and older who were able to complete the self-administered questionnaire. Data from 815 individuals who completed the questionnaire without help (58.8% valid response rate) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to identify the factors underlying the scale. Reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was tested through sample, criterion-related, convergent, and discriminant validity. Results The development and validation of the DASFWB identified a three-factor, 12-item scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the scale and its three factors were 0.857, 0.843, 0.723, and 0.644, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis model indices were as follows: χ 2 = 146.574, df = 51, p < 0.001, comparative goodness of fit index = 0.930, goodness of fit index = 0.945, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.909, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.068. The composite reliability value for convergent validity, which was >0.7, was higher than the average variance extracted value. The criterion-related validity showed a weak correlation (ρ = −0.245 to 0.341, p < 0.001). Discussion The DASFWB exhibits good reliability and validity, indicating its utility as a measuring instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410048
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the dementia attitude scale focusing on well-being

Xuxin Peng, Hisae Nakatani, Hironobu Hamada, Ichie Ono et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Health and Wellbeing Research
0.85
article

Development of the dementia attitude scale focusing on well-being

Xuxin Peng, Hisae Nakatani, Hironobu Hamada, Ichie Ono, Yuriko Inoue
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction This study aimed to develop the Dementia Attitude Scale Focusing on well-being (DASFWB) and to verify its reliability and validity. This scale measures the factors that individuals without dementia would consider important for their well-being if they were to develop dementia. It is expected to serve as a useful indicator for intervention strategies aimed at achieving an inclusive society. Methods The draft DASFWB scale was developed by extracting stories from older adults with mild Alzheimer's disease. The questionnaire was distributed to 1,614 adults aged 65 and older who were able to complete the self-administered questionnaire. Data from 815 individuals who completed the questionnaire without help (58.8% valid response rate) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to identify the factors underlying the scale. Reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was tested through sample, criterion-related, convergent, and discriminant validity. Results The development and validation of the DASFWB identified a three-factor, 12-item scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the scale and its three factors were 0.857, 0.843, 0.723, and 0.644, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis model indices were as follows: χ 2 = 146.574, df = 51, p < 0.001, comparative goodness of fit index = 0.930, goodness of fit index = 0.945, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.909, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.068. The composite reliability value for convergent validity, which was >0.7, was higher than the average variance extracted value. The criterion-related validity showed a weak correlation (ρ = −0.245 to 0.341, p < 0.001). Discussion The DASFWB exhibits good reliability and validity, indicating its utility as a measuring instrument.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15
Hiroshima University (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Health and Wellbeing Research
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.