From shared to residential mobility services? Carsharing and bike-sharing development under the influence of flexible parking requirements

• Flexible parking requirements are an important actant of change in shared mobility. • The results uncover narratives, assemblages and challenges for shared mobility. • Extended understanding of open-access versus exclusive residential carsharing. • In four cases, bike-sharing does not function under flexible parking requirements. • Business model and Actor-network theory – useful analytical framework. As a way of decreasing car ownership and use, one of the significant causes of road passenger transport-related emissions, a growing number of municipalities in Sweden and globally promote car- and bike-sharing by implementing Flexible Parking Requirements. Evaluations of how these requirements affect mobility patterns among residents are emerging. Still, research on the implications for the carsharing and bike-sharing business models and overall service development is lacking. This paper aims to address this by investigating how the development of car- and bike-sharing services is affected by Flexible Parking Requirements. We study four cases based on mobility service providers and specific properties in Sweden through the lens of business model literature and actor-network theory. The results uncover specific narratives, assemblages and challenges related to each case. The carsharing services highlighted the difference in success between open-access and exclusive residential mobility services. Bike-sharing services were characterized by diverse weaknesses and threats that must be addressed for functioning services. The results indicate Flexible Parking Requirements being an important actant of change in defining the services offerings and shaping assemblages. A plethora of actants is identified in the assemblage around car- and bike-sharing services. The paper helps to identify the missing pieces in aligning all of them to have persistence and lasting services. In the concluding discussion, the new roles of the apartment blocks and residential mobility services are discussed within the transport system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Travel Behaviour and Society
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100968
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From shared to residential mobility services? Carsharing and bike-sharing development under the influence of flexible parking requirements

Fredrik Johansson, Erika Styre
3 citations
Travel Behaviour and Society
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.61
article

From shared to residential mobility services? Carsharing and bike-sharing development under the influence of flexible parking requirements

Fredrik Johansson, Erika Styre
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Flexible parking requirements are an important actant of change in shared mobility. • The results uncover narratives, assemblages and challenges for shared mobility. • Extended understanding of open-access versus exclusive residential carsharing. • In four cases, bike-sharing does not function under flexible parking requirements. • Business model and Actor-network theory – useful analytical framework. As a way of decreasing car ownership and use, one of the significant causes of road passenger transport-related emissions, a growing number of municipalities in Sweden and globally promote car- and bike-sharing by implementing Flexible Parking Requirements. Evaluations of how these requirements affect mobility patterns among residents are emerging. Still, research on the implications for the carsharing and bike-sharing business models and overall service development is lacking. This paper aims to address this by investigating how the development of car- and bike-sharing services is affected by Flexible Parking Requirements. We study four cases based on mobility service providers and specific properties in Sweden through the lens of business model literature and actor-network theory. The results uncover specific narratives, assemblages and challenges related to each case. The carsharing services highlighted the difference in success between open-access and exclusive residential mobility services. Bike-sharing services were characterized by diverse weaknesses and threats that must be addressed for functioning services. The results indicate Flexible Parking Requirements being an important actant of change in defining the services offerings and shaping assemblages. A plethora of actants is identified in the assemblage around car- and bike-sharing services. The paper helps to identify the missing pieces in aligning all of them to have persistence and lasting services. In the concluding discussion, the new roles of the apartment blocks and residential mobility services are discussed within the transport system.

Travel Behaviour and SocietyVol. 39
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.