“Can the participation of civil society in policy networks mitigate against societal challenges in rural areas?”

Rural areas increasingly face a raft of societal economic, social and place-based challenges, which civil society potentially has a role to play in mitigating. However, there are gaps in extant knowledge as to whether policy networks are present in rural areas and if they are, what, if any, role civil society plays in these in seeking to mitigate societal challenges in rural areas. Initially, we show how the societal challenges of rural areas may be addressed through policy networks. Policy network theory guides our analysis in eight rural areas in Denmark. The analysis is based on semi-structured interviews with 38 local stakeholders from in- and outside civil society. Based on the literature reviewed, we establish four dimensions that are important for the success of policy networks in mitigating societal challenges. In our analysis, we focus on these four dimensions in assessing the presence and role of policy networks in rural areas. The four dimensions describe the extent to which 1) collaboration occurs amongst a wide selection of representatives from civil society, other local stakeholders and local government, 2) steering from local government is characterized by ‘strategic signposting’ and trust, 3) local stakeholders are invited early into decision-making processes and influence them and 4) a mutual resource dependency is observed. We conclude by discussing to what extent the type of policy network found is able to mitigate the pressing societal challenges of rural areas and, finally, we make recommendations for how to support civil society in contributing to the mitigation of these societal challenges at three levels (local government, associations and citizens). • Rural areas increasingly face a raft of economic, social and place-based challenges for which civil society potentially has a role to play in mitigating. • The societal challenges of rural areas might be mitigated through governance policy networks. • We find that policy networks are present in rural areas, and they have a role in mitigating societal challenges in rural areas. • We make recommendations for how to support civil society in mitigating societal challenges in rural areas on three levels (local government, associations and citizens).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103495
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Can the participation of civil society in policy networks mitigate against societal challenges in rural areas?”

Evald Bundgård Iversen, Bjarne Ibsen, Leonie Lockstone‐Binney
7 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Rural development and sustainability
9.40
article

“Can the participation of civil society in policy networks mitigate against societal challenges in rural areas?”

Evald Bundgård Iversen, Bjarne Ibsen, Leonie Lockstone‐Binney
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Rural areas increasingly face a raft of societal economic, social and place-based challenges, which civil society potentially has a role to play in mitigating. However, there are gaps in extant knowledge as to whether policy networks are present in rural areas and if they are, what, if any, role civil society plays in these in seeking to mitigate societal challenges in rural areas. Initially, we show how the societal challenges of rural areas may be addressed through policy networks. Policy network theory guides our analysis in eight rural areas in Denmark. The analysis is based on semi-structured interviews with 38 local stakeholders from in- and outside civil society. Based on the literature reviewed, we establish four dimensions that are important for the success of policy networks in mitigating societal challenges. In our analysis, we focus on these four dimensions in assessing the presence and role of policy networks in rural areas. The four dimensions describe the extent to which 1) collaboration occurs amongst a wide selection of representatives from civil society, other local stakeholders and local government, 2) steering from local government is characterized by ‘strategic signposting’ and trust, 3) local stakeholders are invited early into decision-making processes and influence them and 4) a mutual resource dependency is observed. We conclude by discussing to what extent the type of policy network found is able to mitigate the pressing societal challenges of rural areas and, finally, we make recommendations for how to support civil society in contributing to the mitigation of these societal challenges at three levels (local government, associations and citizens). • Rural areas increasingly face a raft of economic, social and place-based challenges for which civil society potentially has a role to play in mitigating. • The societal challenges of rural areas might be mitigated through governance policy networks. • We find that policy networks are present in rural areas, and they have a role in mitigating societal challenges in rural areas. • We make recommendations for how to support civil society in mitigating societal challenges in rural areas on three levels (local government, associations and citizens).

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 113
Griffith University (AU), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Innovation Cluster (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Rural development and sustainability
9.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.