Bridging the gap: Discrepancies in energy efficiency and smart readiness of buildings

This study addresses the critical gap between traditional energy performance assessments and the Smart Readiness Indicator, a tool introduced in the European Union to evaluate a building’s ability to incorporate smart technologies for improved energy management. This divergence is important as it can lead to misinterpretations of a building's efficiency and adaptability, affecting stakeholders’ decisions and policy implementation. Using a comparative analysis of two pilot buildings in Bucharest, Romania, and Nicosia, Cyprus, this research highlights significant differences between energy performance ratings and SRI scores, with findings indicating a discrepancy of up to 18 % in perceived efficiency. Through this analysis, the study not only reveals the limitations of current assessment practices but also provides actionable recommendations to better align energy metrics with the Smart Readiness Indicator, ultimately contributing to a more integrated approach to sustainable building evaluations. The novelty of this work lies in its focus on bridging these assessment gaps, offering insights that go beyond existing literature by proposing enhanced policy measures for the integration of smart readiness into standard building performance evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.11.060
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap: Discrepancies in energy efficiency and smart readiness of buildings

Manolis Souliotis, Răzvan Calotă, Paris A. Fokaides, Florin Bode et al.
7 citations
Energy Reports
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.86
article

Bridging the gap: Discrepancies in energy efficiency and smart readiness of buildings

Manolis Souliotis, Răzvan Calotă, Paris A. Fokaides, Florin Bode, Cristiana Croitoru
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study addresses the critical gap between traditional energy performance assessments and the Smart Readiness Indicator, a tool introduced in the European Union to evaluate a building’s ability to incorporate smart technologies for improved energy management. This divergence is important as it can lead to misinterpretations of a building's efficiency and adaptability, affecting stakeholders’ decisions and policy implementation. Using a comparative analysis of two pilot buildings in Bucharest, Romania, and Nicosia, Cyprus, this research highlights significant differences between energy performance ratings and SRI scores, with findings indicating a discrepancy of up to 18 % in perceived efficiency. Through this analysis, the study not only reveals the limitations of current assessment practices but also provides actionable recommendations to better align energy metrics with the Smart Readiness Indicator, ultimately contributing to a more integrated approach to sustainable building evaluations. The novelty of this work lies in its focus on bridging these assessment gaps, offering insights that go beyond existing literature by proposing enhanced policy measures for the integration of smart readiness into standard building performance evaluations.

Energy ReportsVol. 12
Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest (RO), Technical University of Cluj-Napoca (RO), Kaunas University of Technology (LT), Frederick University (CY), University of Western Macedonia (GR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.