Predicting Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy and Beef Cattle Using Nutrient Composition and Intake Variables

The objective of this study was to develop linear and nonlinear statistical models for predicting enteric methane emissions from beef and dairy cattle (EME, MJ/day). Ration nutrient composition (g/kg), nutrient (kg/day), energy (MJ/day), and energy and organic matter (OM) digestibility (g/kg) were used as predictors of CH<sub>4</sub> production. Three databases of beef cattle, dairy cattle, and their combinations were developed using 34 published experiments to model EME predictions. Linear and nonlinear regression models were developed using a mixed-model approach to predict CH<sub>4</sub> production (MJ/day) of individual animals based on feed composition. For the beef cattle database, Equation methane (MJ/d) = 1.6063 (±0.757) + 0.4256 (±0.0745) × DMI + 1.2213 (±0.1715) × NDFI + -0.475 (±0.446) × ADFI had the smallest RMSPE (21.99%), with 83.51% of this coming from random error and a regression bias was 16.49%. For the dairy cattle database, the RMSPE was minimized (15.99%) for methane (MJ/d) = 0.3989 (±1.1073) + 0.8685 (±0.1585) × DMI + 0.6675 (±0.4264) × NDFI, of which 85.11% was from random error and the regression deviation was 14.89%. When the beef and dairy cattle databases were combined, the RMSPE was minimized (24.4%) for methane(MJ/d) = -0.3496 (±0.723) + 0.5941 (±0.0851) × DMI + 1.388 (±0.2203) × NDFI + -0.027 (±0.4223) × ADFI, of which 85.62% was from the random error and the regression bias was 14.38%. Among the nonlinear equations for the three databases, the DMI-based exponential model outperformed the other nonlinear models, but the predictability and goodness of fit of the equations did not improve compared to the linear model. The existing equations overestimate CH<sub>4</sub> production with low accuracy and precision. Therefore, the equations developed in this study improve the preparation of methane inventories and thus improve the estimation of methane production in beef and dairy cattle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14233452
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy and Beef Cattle Using Nutrient Composition and Intake Variables

Yaodong Wang, Fei Yang, Weitao Song, Zhengang Yan et al.
6 citations
Animals
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
3.41
article

Predicting Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy and Beef Cattle Using Nutrient Composition and Intake Variables

Yaodong Wang, Fei Yang, Weitao Song, Zhengang Yan, Qian Wang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop linear and nonlinear statistical models for predicting enteric methane emissions from beef and dairy cattle (EME, MJ/day). Ration nutrient composition (g/kg), nutrient (kg/day), energy (MJ/day), and energy and organic matter (OM) digestibility (g/kg) were used as predictors of CH<sub>4</sub> production. Three databases of beef cattle, dairy cattle, and their combinations were developed using 34 published experiments to model EME predictions. Linear and nonlinear regression models were developed using a mixed-model approach to predict CH<sub>4</sub> production (MJ/day) of individual animals based on feed composition. For the beef cattle database, Equation methane (MJ/d) = 1.6063 (±0.757) + 0.4256 (±0.0745) × DMI + 1.2213 (±0.1715) × NDFI + -0.475 (±0.446) × ADFI had the smallest RMSPE (21.99%), with 83.51% of this coming from random error and a regression bias was 16.49%. For the dairy cattle database, the RMSPE was minimized (15.99%) for methane (MJ/d) = 0.3989 (±1.1073) + 0.8685 (±0.1585) × DMI + 0.6675 (±0.4264) × NDFI, of which 85.11% was from random error and the regression deviation was 14.89%. When the beef and dairy cattle databases were combined, the RMSPE was minimized (24.4%) for methane(MJ/d) = -0.3496 (±0.723) + 0.5941 (±0.0851) × DMI + 1.388 (±0.2203) × NDFI + -0.027 (±0.4223) × ADFI, of which 85.62% was from the random error and the regression bias was 14.38%. Among the nonlinear equations for the three databases, the DMI-based exponential model outperformed the other nonlinear models, but the predictability and goodness of fit of the equations did not improve compared to the linear model. The existing equations overestimate CH<sub>4</sub> production with low accuracy and precision. Therefore, the equations developed in this study improve the preparation of methane inventories and thus improve the estimation of methane production in beef and dairy cattle.

AnimalsVol. 14(23)
Gansu Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
3.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.