Impact of floating debris on houses during floods and vegetation-based mitigation

Debris generated by the destruction of houses in a floodplain can cause damage to structures in the way of floodwaters due to the impact of different hydraulic forces. In this study, the impacts of different hydraulic forces, including impact force, hydrostatic force, hydrodynamic force, fluid force index (FFI) and moment index (MI), on house models of different porosity were examined. The impacts of these hydraulic forces on house models for different types of debris (rectangular and cylindrical debris) were also investigated. The results showed that type D5 cylindrical debris (with the greatest mass) had a greater specific gravity (0.206) than the other types of debris examined, which was why it resulted in a higher magnitude of impact force (40%) for the double porous house model (DPHM). Type D3 cylindrical debris (with the longest length) produced the highest value of hydrostatic force (40%). A higher velocity of flow caused a greater magnitude of the FFI (60%) on the impermeable house model (IHM), and this reduced with an increase in the porosity of the house model. The highest MI (97%) acted on the IHM because of greater flow velocity and water depth on the upstream side. Under different types of debris, vegetation provided as a countermeasure on the upstream side of the house model reduced the impact force by 10–22% for the DPHM and by 1–12% for the SPHM; the hydrostatic force was reduced by 12–59%. Hydrodynamic force reduction was observed to be 30% when vegetation was provided on the upstream side of house models of different porosity. Providing vegetation as a countermeasure reduced the FFI and MI by up to, respectively, 70% and 63.39% for the IHM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jwama.23.00055
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of floating debris on houses during floods and vegetation-based mitigation

Ghufran Ahmed Pasha, Abdul Razzaq Ghumman, Muhammad Arif Asghar, Nadir Murtaza et al.
3 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
1.38
article

Impact of floating debris on houses during floods and vegetation-based mitigation

Ghufran Ahmed Pasha, Abdul Razzaq Ghumman, Muhammad Arif Asghar, Nadir Murtaza, Afzal Ahmed, K. I. M. Iqbal
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Debris generated by the destruction of houses in a floodplain can cause damage to structures in the way of floodwaters due to the impact of different hydraulic forces. In this study, the impacts of different hydraulic forces, including impact force, hydrostatic force, hydrodynamic force, fluid force index (FFI) and moment index (MI), on house models of different porosity were examined. The impacts of these hydraulic forces on house models for different types of debris (rectangular and cylindrical debris) were also investigated. The results showed that type D5 cylindrical debris (with the greatest mass) had a greater specific gravity (0.206) than the other types of debris examined, which was why it resulted in a higher magnitude of impact force (40%) for the double porous house model (DPHM). Type D3 cylindrical debris (with the longest length) produced the highest value of hydrostatic force (40%). A higher velocity of flow caused a greater magnitude of the FFI (60%) on the impermeable house model (IHM), and this reduced with an increase in the porosity of the house model. The highest MI (97%) acted on the IHM because of greater flow velocity and water depth on the upstream side. Under different types of debris, vegetation provided as a countermeasure on the upstream side of the house model reduced the impact force by 10–22% for the DPHM and by 1–12% for the SPHM; the hydrostatic force was reduced by 12–59%. Hydrodynamic force reduction was observed to be 30% when vegetation was provided on the upstream side of house models of different porosity. Providing vegetation as a countermeasure reduced the FFI and MI by up to, respectively, 70% and 63.39% for the IHM.

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water ManagementVol. 178(2)
Qassim University (SA), University of Engineering and Technology Taxila (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.