Regulating the Competence of Administrative Justice and the Public-Private Law Divide

Purpose: The paper investigates the dichotomy between public and private law in terms of access to justice, especially the distribution of competences between various courts and tribunals.Design/Methodology/Approach: The study employs juridical analysis of normative texts and legal comparison.Findings: The continuous expansion of administrative justice calls for a more differentiated yet generalised regulation of access to justice.Academic Contribution to the Field: The analysis addresses policy options regarding the distribution of competences between civil and administrative courts, as well as the potential establishment of specialised courts.Originality/Significance/Value: The analysis of regulatory approaches helps legislators meet the requirements of both timeliness and effectiveness of judicial protection, as well as handle the challenges of blending public and private law instruments to create a regulation that is able to provide effective judicial protection and consistency in case-law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Central European Public Administration Review
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2024.2.09
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating the Competence of Administrative Justice and the Public-Private Law Divide

Krisztina F. Rozsnyai
Central European Public Administration Review
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Regulating the Competence of Administrative Justice and the Public-Private Law Divide

Krisztina F. Rozsnyai
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The paper investigates the dichotomy between public and private law in terms of access to justice, especially the distribution of competences between various courts and tribunals.Design/Methodology/Approach: The study employs juridical analysis of normative texts and legal comparison.Findings: The continuous expansion of administrative justice calls for a more differentiated yet generalised regulation of access to justice.Academic Contribution to the Field: The analysis addresses policy options regarding the distribution of competences between civil and administrative courts, as well as the potential establishment of specialised courts.Originality/Significance/Value: The analysis of regulatory approaches helps legislators meet the requirements of both timeliness and effectiveness of judicial protection, as well as handle the challenges of blending public and private law instruments to create a regulation that is able to provide effective judicial protection and consistency in case-law.

Central European Public Administration ReviewVol. 22(2)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.