Protecting fundamental values through the global human rights sanction regime: China's challenges to the EU's normative power

In 2021, the European Council, implementing the Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, imposed sanctions on four Chinese officials and one entity believed to be responsible for human rights violations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. These sanctions marked the EU's resumption of a hard normative approach towards China, which responded with strong countermeasures. The exchange of sanctions and countersanctions, along with the ensuing debates, offered a valuable opportunity to observe the EU's normative power in international politics. A qualitative content analysis of documents from both China and the EU reveals that while the EU aims to uphold its moral objectives, it faces significant internal and external challenges. The EU's ability to effectively counter China is limited by institutional weaknesses, inconsistent policies, and diminished credibility. Furthermore, the EU is institutionally unprepared for the consequences of imposing sanctions on such a powerful partner and competitor. On the other hand, China has become increasingly assertive in defending its political system and values, responding to EU sanctions with strong countermeasures, thereby complicating the EU's efforts to maintain leverage in this diplomatic struggle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Human Rights
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2432955
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protecting fundamental values through the global human rights sanction regime: China's challenges to the EU's normative power

P Stefani, Ling Han
1 citations
The International Journal of Human Rights
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
1.13
article

Protecting fundamental values through the global human rights sanction regime: China's challenges to the EU's normative power

P Stefani, Ling Han
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 2021, the European Council, implementing the Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, imposed sanctions on four Chinese officials and one entity believed to be responsible for human rights violations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. These sanctions marked the EU's resumption of a hard normative approach towards China, which responded with strong countermeasures. The exchange of sanctions and countersanctions, along with the ensuing debates, offered a valuable opportunity to observe the EU's normative power in international politics. A qualitative content analysis of documents from both China and the EU reveals that while the EU aims to uphold its moral objectives, it faces significant internal and external challenges. The EU's ability to effectively counter China is limited by institutional weaknesses, inconsistent policies, and diminished credibility. Furthermore, the EU is institutionally unprepared for the consequences of imposing sanctions on such a powerful partner and competitor. On the other hand, China has become increasingly assertive in defending its political system and values, responding to EU sanctions with strong countermeasures, thereby complicating the EU's efforts to maintain leverage in this diplomatic struggle.

The International Journal of Human RightsVol. 29(5)
University of Padua (IT), Guangzhou University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.