Mental health interventions in public health emergencies: The best and the rest in research, evidence, intervention, and policy responses

The COVID-19 pandemic showed the significant impact of epidemics on mental health and illustrated gaps in public health and epidemic response systems’ ability to respond to mental health and psychosocial needs. This study sought to identify the most and least helpful mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) strategies and elements for intervention in epidemics. An online survey with open ended questions was circulated via professional networks and listservs and completed by 11 MHPSS experts with experience in epidemics in July–August 2023. Data were analyzed using a thematic coding approach. Three case studies of MHPSS interventions from Liberia, South Africa, and Uganda are provided. The most helpful MHPSS strategies were seen as community-based, integrated with other response systems, inclusive of vulnerable populations, drawing on lived experience and peer support, timely, and rapid. Unhelpful strategies rely on unnuanced sensitization messages, are siloed, and lack community consultation. Case studies illustrate the complexities of delivery in context and highlight the importance of lived experience, community engagement, and local adaptation for success. MHPSS services can be employed nimbly and help respond to misinformation and disinformation but work best when integrated with other services. Capacity, particularly among community health workers, for these services must be elevated as a priority in emergency preparedness. While remote interventions are important, they cannot always reach those in most need, and social connection matters. These considerations can guide recognition of mental health as an interconnected public health priority in epidemic response going forward. • Rapid MHPSS interventions were launched quickly and worked well in epidemics. • Epidemics are a time for significant innovation in MHPSS service delivery. • Social connection matters for MHPSS in epidemics. • MHPSS interventions need to be integrated across sectors in epidemics. • MHPSS needs to be elevated as a clinical and frontline priority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Mental Health
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100375
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health interventions in public health emergencies: The best and the rest in research, evidence, intervention, and policy responses

Emma Louise Backe, Sarah McIvor Murray, Sharon Abramowitz, Dhruvi Banerjee et al.
4 citations
SSM - Mental Health
Homelessness and Social Issues
3.40
article

Mental health interventions in public health emergencies: The best and the rest in research, evidence, intervention, and policy responses

Emma Louise Backe, Sarah McIvor Murray, Sharon Abramowitz, Dhruvi Banerjee, Wilfred Gwaikolo, Susan Nkengesong
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic showed the significant impact of epidemics on mental health and illustrated gaps in public health and epidemic response systems’ ability to respond to mental health and psychosocial needs. This study sought to identify the most and least helpful mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) strategies and elements for intervention in epidemics. An online survey with open ended questions was circulated via professional networks and listservs and completed by 11 MHPSS experts with experience in epidemics in July–August 2023. Data were analyzed using a thematic coding approach. Three case studies of MHPSS interventions from Liberia, South Africa, and Uganda are provided. The most helpful MHPSS strategies were seen as community-based, integrated with other response systems, inclusive of vulnerable populations, drawing on lived experience and peer support, timely, and rapid. Unhelpful strategies rely on unnuanced sensitization messages, are siloed, and lack community consultation. Case studies illustrate the complexities of delivery in context and highlight the importance of lived experience, community engagement, and local adaptation for success. MHPSS services can be employed nimbly and help respond to misinformation and disinformation but work best when integrated with other services. Capacity, particularly among community health workers, for these services must be elevated as a priority in emergency preparedness. While remote interventions are important, they cannot always reach those in most need, and social connection matters. These considerations can guide recognition of mental health as an interconnected public health priority in epidemic response going forward. • Rapid MHPSS interventions were launched quickly and worked well in epidemics. • Epidemics are a time for significant innovation in MHPSS service delivery. • Social connection matters for MHPSS in epidemics. • MHPSS interventions need to be integrated across sectors in epidemics. • MHPSS needs to be elevated as a clinical and frontline priority.

SSM - Mental HealthVol. 7
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Cape Town (ZA), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), Georgetown University (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US), University of Global Health Equity (RW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Homelessness and Social Issues
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.